Economic Calendar

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Kleiner Perkins Goes After Twitter-Like Startups in Content Push

By Olga Kharif - Oct 13, 2011 11:01 AM GMT+0700

Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers will invest in two mobile startups in the next week that turn users of their applications and services into contributors, said Matt Murphy, a partner at the venture firm.

One of the investments may be announced today and the other in a week, said Murphy, who didn’t disclose the names of the companies.

Kleiner, which has stakes in Twitter Inc. and Groupon Inc., is ramping up investments in what it calls local crowdsourced content and commerce, Murphy said in an interview. Users of these applications may contribute video, services or coupons to consumers nearby. The idea is to replicate the success of sites like Twitter, where people share article links and short statements, in an array of mobile apps.

“We are getting to a stage in mobile where people are willing to do more than just consume, they are interested in being content creators,” Murphy said. “It’s one of the biggest trends we are seeing in mobile. It really unlocks the potential of mobile. People can help make experiences more interesting.”

As part of this trend, consumers will increasingly interact with merchants through applications or services by sharing an image or sending a text message, Murphy said.

For example, Uber is a service that lets users request car service via text message or a mobile app. Uber, which is not a Kleiner investment, sends the request to the nearest driver and sends the customer an estimated arrival time. Uber puts the crowd of professional drivers and potential customers together, and lets them interact.

“It will be integral to many, many applications,” Murphy said.

The startups can make money by taking a cut of the offers, or through advertising revenue, Murphy said. Ads served to apps to which users contribute content may command higher rates, he said.

“Because the user-generated contribution is so valuable, you can see higher engagement rates,” Murphy said.

To contact the reporter on this story: Olga Kharif in Portland, Oregon, at okharif@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Asia Stocks Rise for 6th Day as Bond Risk Falls

By Shiyin Chen - Oct 13, 2011 12:31 PM GMT+0700

Asia stocks rose for a sixth day, while bond risk fell on speculation policy makers in Europe, the U.S. and China will prevent the global economy from sliding into a recession. Commodities declined.

The MSCI Asia Pacific Index jumped 1.4 percent at 2:28 p.m. in Tokyo and Standard & Poor’s 500 Index futures were little changed. The Markit iTraxx Asia index of default risk among 40 investment-grade borrowers outside Japan sank a seventh day. The euro traded at $1.3803, near the strongest level in almost four weeks. The Australian dollar and South Korea’s won climbed to the strongest levels in three weeks. Oil lost 0.9 percent in New York, while copper sank 1.9 percent.

European Commission President Jose Barroso yesterday called for a reinforcement of crisis-hit banks, the payout of a sixth loan to Greece and a faster start for a permanent rescue fund. The Fed said some officials last month wanted to keep further asset purchases as an option to boost the economy. China unveiled a package of measures to help small companies, including tax breaks and easier access to bank loans.

“There’s definitely been a change in the rhetoric if not the policy action,” Mohammed Apabhai, head of Asia trading at Citigroup Inc., said in a Bloomberg Television interview in Hong Kong. Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and German Chancellor Angela Merkel “have stepped in and said they’ll do whatever it takes. You’ve seen the turnaround in China and the loosening they seem to be embarking on, and there’s probably more to come.”

About five shares rose for every two that fell on MSCI’s Asia Pacific Index, which was poised for its longest winning streak since Sept. 1. The Nikkei 225 Stock Average added 1 percent and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 Index gained 1 percent.

Korea, China

The Kospi Index rallied 1.5 percent after the U.S. Congress cleared legislation for a free-trade agreement with South Korea. Hyundai Mobis (012330) Co. rose 2.1 percent, pacing gains among automobile parts makers, on speculation the companies will benefit from the accord.

The CSI Smallcap 500 Index (SZ399905), comprising companies with a average market value of 6.28 billion yuan ($985 million), rose 1.1 percent, more than the 0.2 percent increase on the Shanghai Composite Index. The Chinese government will provide financial support and preferential tax policies for small companies, the State Council said yesterday after a meeting at which Premier Wen Jiabao presided. The government will be more tolerant of bad loan ratios for small-company loans, the Cabinet said.

Data today showed Chinese exports climbed 17.1 percent last month, the least since February, and imports growth slowed to 20.9 percent.

The S&P 500 gained 1 percent yesterday, rounding off a three-day, 4.4 percent rally. JPMorgan Chase & Co. may say today profit slid 10 percent in the third quarter, the biggest drop in more than two years, according to estimates by analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.

Fed Minutes

Minutes from the Fed’s Sept. 20-21 meeting showed policy makers saw “considerable uncertainty” that U.S. growth will pick up. Most participants favored giving additional information on the central bank’s goals and how they influence decisions, and most “saw advantages” in tying the Fed’s near-zero interest rates to more-specific developments in the economy, according to the minutes. Treasuries snapped a six-day drop, dragging 10-year yields down one basis point to 2.20 percent today.

The cost of insuring Asia corporate and sovereign bonds against non-payment decreased, with the Markit iTraxx Asia index sliding 6 basis points to 207.5 basis points in Singapore, Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc prices show. That’s set for a seventh consecutive day of declines and the lowest level since Sept. 21, according to data provider CMA.

The Markit iTraxx Japan index fell 7 basis points to 193.5 in Tokyo, Citigroup Inc. prices show. A close of 193.5 would be the lowest since Sept. 21, CMA data show.

Australian Jobs

The Australian dollar climbed 0.4 percent to $1.0195 after earlier rising to $1.0233 after the unemployment rate fell for the first time since March. The number of people employed rose by 20,400, from a revised 10,500 fall in August and the jobless rate fell to 5.2 percent from 5.3 percent, the statistics bureau said in Sydney. South Korea’s won gained 0.9 percent to 1,155.88 per dollar and earlier touched 1,154.78, the strongest level since Sept. 21. The Bank of Korea left its seven-day repurchase rate unchanged at 3.25 percent during a review, a decision predicted by all 15 economists surveyed by Bloomberg.

The euro yesterday rallied 1.1 percent against the dollar. The 17-nation currency fell 0.2 percent to 106.39 yen. It reached 107.05 yen yesterday, the most since Sept. 9. The dollar lost 0.2 percent to 77.08 yen. Slovakia is set to approve Europe’s enhanced bailout fund today or tomorrow, completing the ratification process across the 17 euro countries.

Copper, Oil

The U.S. will intensify its call for forceful action from Europe at a meeting of Group of 20 nations in Paris this week, Lael Brainard, the Treasury undersecretary for international affairs, said yesterday. An Oct. 23 summit of euro leaders looms as a deadline for a breakthrough in combating the crisis.

“Risk appetite has improved because of the positive news from Europe and the U.S.,” said Syhiful Zamri, director of investment, research and advisory at Kenanga Investors Bhd. in Kuala Lumpur.

Copper dropped as much as 2.3 percent to $7,355 a metric ton on the London Metal Exchange, after yesterday climbing to the highest level in two weeks yesterday. Nickel retreated 0.9 percent and tin sank 1.4 percent.

Oil for November delivery dropped 0.9 percent to $84.83 a barrel after American Petroleum Institute data showed U.S. implied gasoline demand fell the most in more than five years. The International Energy Agency yesterday cut its 2012 demand estimate for oil by 210,000 barrels a day and said Libyan output will rebound to 50 percent more than earlier forecast.

To contact the reporters on this story: Shiyin Chen in Singapore at schen37@bloomberg.net; at echew16@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Shelley Smith at ssmith118@bloomberg.net.




Read more...

Singapore Economic Growth Seen Near Zero

By Shamim Adam and Sarina Yoo - Oct 13, 2011 8:37 AM GMT+0700

Singapore’s economic growth probably nearly stalled last quarter as a faltering global recovery hurt exports, putting pressure on the central bank to join nations from Indonesia to Pakistan in easing monetary policy.

Gross domestic product probably rose an annualized 0.8 percent last quarter from the previous three months, when it fell 6.5 percent, according to the median of 16 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey. The Monetary Authority of Singapore, which uses the island’s dollar as its main tool to manage inflation, may slow or end currency appreciation, a separate survey showed. Both reports will be released at 8 a.m. tomorrow.

Any return to recession for the global economy would threaten a Singaporean economy that saw an 11 percent collapse in exports in 2009. With a potential Greek default threatening to reverberate through world financial markets, Singapore may shift to stimulus measures just six months after its last monetary tightening.

“With the U.S. and European indicators pointing to a sluggish, faltering recovery and no signs of any determined policy response, Singapore’s investment and external demand could only have deteriorated further in the third quarter, bringing down overall GDP growth,” said Vincent Conti, a Singapore-based analyst at Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. “The MAS will likely shift to a neutral stance.”

Singapore Dollar

The central bank said in April it would allow further currency appreciation to tame price gains, the third monetary policy tightening in a year. The Singapore dollar reached unprecedented levels since then, trading below S$1.20 against its U.S. counterpart in July. It has dropped 6.1 percent since the beginning of August.

The monetary authority guides the Singapore dollar against a basket of currencies within an undisclosed band. It adjusts the pace of appreciation or depreciation by changing the slope, width and center of the band.

The island located at the southern end of the 600-mile (965-kilometer) Malacca Strait is among the first countries in the region to report third-quarter data.

The global slowdown has prompted some Asian central banks to start cutting interest rates or refrain from increasing borrowing costs. The Bank of Korea left its key rate unchanged today at 3.25 percent for a fourth straight month.

Singapore’s economy will probably expand at a slower pace in the next few years and the central bank will continue “judicious management” of its currency to curb inflation and support growth, Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said Oct. 11.

Overseas Demand Risks

The city state, home to the world’s second-busiest container port, has remained vulnerable to fluctuations in overseas demand for manufactured goods even after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s administration boosted financial services and tourism. The government forecasts growth of 5 percent to 6 percent this year, lower than an earlier forecast of as much as 7 percent expansion.

The economy probably grew 5.6 percent in the third quarter from a year earlier, according to the median estimate of 19 economists surveyed by Bloomberg News.

The monetary authority will remain “vigilant” against a resurgence in inflationary pressures and price gains are expected to moderate toward the end of 2011, Shanmugaratnam said this week.

The central bank raised its inflation estimate for 2011 in July to 4 percent to 5 percent, from a previous estimate of 3 percent to 4 percent. Inflation in August accelerated to the fastest pace since 2008 as consumer prices rose 5.7 percent from a year earlier.

To contact the reporter on this story: Shamim Adam in Singapore at sadam2@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Stephanie Phang at sphang@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Australians Fret About Crash With Fortescue Metals Growth Stock

By William Mellor - Oct 13, 2011 3:00 AM GMT+0700
Bloomberg Markets Magazine

Neville Power gazes out the window of a chartered jet at the rust-red, mineral-rich Australian Outback.

Power, 53, is the new chief executive officer of Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. (FMG), a mining company whose one-time penny stock has soared almost 1,200-fold in value in nine years as a result of China’s insatiable hunger for Australian iron ore. While the world teeters on the brink of financial turmoil, Power talks up his company’s next miracle, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its November issue.

Fortescue’s share price surge has at various times lifted the firm into the ranks of the world’s 500 biggest companies -- and among the fastest-growing of this century, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Even though the share price plunged 28 percent this year, an investment of A$10,000 ($10,318) in Fortescue stock at its lowest point in November 2002 would be worth nearly A$12 million today. The 31.5 percent stake of Chairman Andrew Forrest, who took control in 2003, is worth A$4.6 billion.

Power says he’s not resting on past successes. He says Fortescue is spending $8.4 billion to triple production to 155 million tons by 2013.

“When we reach that target, we’ll be as big in iron ore as BHP is today,” Power says, referring to BHP Billiton Ltd. (BHP), the world’s largest mining company.

Profits for Miners

Such lofty ambitions are cutting both ways for Australia, if not for Fortescue. The nation of 22.7 million people sprinkled over a land mass the size of the continental U.S. is in the grip of its biggest mining boom since a mid-19th-century gold rush.

While delivering record profits for miners, surging demand for Australia’s minerals sent the local currency soaring to its highest level in 30 years. It has also forced the government to keep the benchmark interest rate at 4.75 percent, the highest in the developed world.

The combined impact of a rising currency and such high borrowing costs has crippled manufacturers, retailers and other nonmining industries. It has also helped to destabilize Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s 18-month-old government, which clings to power by a single parliamentary seat.

Even for miners, the boom carries risks because of the industry’s potentially dangerous overdependence on a single customer.

Slash China’s Growth

According to Australian government statistics, the country is already the world’s No. 1 exporter of iron ore, coal and alumina. It ranks second in gold, zinc and lead production; fourth in nickel and silver; and sixth in copper.

Now, companies such as Rio Tinto Group, BHP and Fortescue are pouring $174 billion into new projects, according to government estimates. Some 40 percent of those minerals are sold to China.

Chinese steelmakers buy more than 95 percent of Fortescue’s iron ore. A recession in the West could slash China’s growth to 7.3 percent in the first quarter of 2012 from 10.4 percent in 2010, according to Deutsche Bank AG.

Growth may even sink to 5 percent after 2013, Nouriel Roubini, chairman of New York-based Roubini Global Economics LLC, told a conference in Shanghai in July.

“If China’s growth falls by half, the price of nonfood commodities will be seriously affected,” says Michael Pettis, a finance professor at Beijing’s Peking University.

‘Turbo-Charged by Growth’

Gillard rejects such predictions. “We have a resources sector that is turbo-charged by the growth in the region,” she said in an interview with Bloomberg News on Sept. 15. “There’s no advice to me that would cause me concern about Chinese demand collapsing.”

That sort of bullishness was on ample display down under in early August when a record 2,400 mining entrepreneurs and their financial backers flew to the Outback.

Their destination: the Wild West gold-rush-era town of Kalgoorlie. Their purpose: to party and promote their newest discoveries at a beer-fueled annual convention called the Diggers and Dealers Forum.

This was no Davos, the buttoned-down thinkathon for corporate and political elites in the Swiss Alps.

By day, the miners and their bankers convened in a large tent near Australia’s biggest gold mine, a 3-kilometer-long (1.9-mile-long), 1.5-kilometer-wide and 400-meter-deep hole known as the Super Pit.

Scantily Clad

By night, many of them continued their wheeling and dealing at honky-tonk watering holes staffed by female bartenders so scantily clad that they’re known as “skimpies.”

Among those packed 10 deep at the bar amid the fading grandeur of the Palace Hotel one evening in August was David Flanagan, CEO of Atlas Iron Ltd. (AGO), who has increased his company’s market value by more than 50-fold to A$2.9 billion during the past five years.

“There are so many amazing deposits out there that the opportunities are limitless,” Flanagan, 39, says. Nor is he concerned that Atlas Iron doesn’t have a single customer outside China. “If China suddenly catches the flu, the whole planet’s cactus anyway,” he says.

Gina Rinehart skipped the Diggers party but not the dealing. Rinehart, already one of the world’s richest women with a fortune of at least $10 billion, has teamed up with Rio Tinto in the development of the Hope Downs iron ore mine near Fortescue’s pits and is also developing vast coal deposits in Queensland state on the other side of the country.

Amid the Bonhomie

On Sept. 16, Rinehart set about making herself another $1.26 billion when her Hancock Prospecting Ltd agreed to sell a 79 percent stake in two Queensland coal assets to Indian billionaire G.V. Krishna Reddy’s GVK Power & Infrastructure Ltd. (GVKP)

Amid the Diggers and Dealers bonhomie, Todd Buchholz, a former managing director at Tiger Management LLC hedge fund and a one-time adviser to U.S. President George H.W. Bush, struck a note of caution.

“China’s golden moment will eventually fade,” Buchholz said. “Australia can’t just rely on one narrow part of the world economy.”

Fortescue’s Forrest and Power were the undisputed stars of the convention. Having already made his billions, Forrest passed the CEO baton to Power in July and stepped up to the chairmanship so he could spend more time on his philanthropic work.

Forrest will be a hard act to follow. Fortescue’s profit for the financial year that ended on June 30 jumped 76 percent to A$1.02 billion as China in 2010 exceeded the average 10 percent growth surge it has maintained for more than three decades.

Global Markets Plunge

Lately, China’s red-hot economy has been cooling--even before fears over Europe’s debt crisis deepened and global markets began their plunge in the wake of Standard & Poor’s downgrading the U.S. to an AA+ credit rating.

The slowdown began after Beijing raised interest rates and curbed lending in a bid to lower inflation, which in July hit a three-year high of 6.5 percent, before easing to 6.2 percent in August. Partly as a result, global commodities prices slipped 18 percent from April 8 to Oct. 11 after more than doubling in the previous two years, according to the S&P GSCI Index.

The Australian economy is also not shining on miners such as Fortescue. Unemployment, while rising slightly as a result of the troubles of the economy outside of mining, is still just 5.3 percent -- barely half of what it is in the U.S.

Spiraling Costs

While that may sound like good news, there is such a shortage of skilled labor that average wages in the mining industry have jumped 33 percent in the past five years to A$2,113 a week.

That’s almost twice as much as miners earn in the U.S., according to government statistics in both countries. The state of the Australian dollar doesn’t help, either.

Mining companies are paid in U.S. dollars by their customers, yet they have to pay their employees in the local currency, which soared more than 40 percent in three years to well above parity with its U.S. counterpart before losing some of those gains in September. It was trading at just below parity on Oct 12.

Other costs have spiraled even higher. The giant, 3.5- meter-diameter tires used on dump trucks that haul iron ore and coal have tripled in price to $100,000 each -- roughly the price of a Porsche 911 Carrera S -- on the spot market, according to Leighton Holdings Ltd., a contractor for BHP and other mining companies.

Other Sectors Wilt

In August, Rio Tinto blamed rising costs and currency gains for a profit that came in below analysts’ estimates despite climbing 30 percent to $7.6 billion in the first half of 2011.

Now, the mining companies face the prospect of higher taxes. As other sectors of the economy wilt, Prime Minister Gillard is planning to introduce an additional 30 percent tax on iron ore and coal miners’ profits next year and, in a bid to reduce pollution, charge them $23 a ton on their carbon emissions.

Fortescue’s 28 percent share price decline compares with an 11 percent fall in the benchmark index as of Oct. 12. Still, Power says his faith in Fortescue’s prospects is undiminished.

“All I have to do to allay any concerns is to take another trip back to China,” Power says. “It is such a tremendous country, with a great track record of development.”

Power says he’s not reassured simply by China’s soaring city skylines and massive construction projects that consume the steel made from Australian iron ore, coal and manganese.

‘Even More Dependent’

What strikes him more, Power says, is the Chinese government’s decision to move major steelworks to the coast from inland. Beijing-based Shougang Group has already shifted operations, and Baosteel Group Corp. and Wuhan Iron & Steel Co. plan to follow suit.

“That shows the Chinese intend to become even more dependent on imported iron ore than on their own domestic mines,” Power says.

If something does go wrong in China, Fortescue has a cushion. Power says the company could still be profitable even if iron ore prices plunge to $70 a ton from the average of $169 that Fortescue obtained last year.

Australia’s biggest money manager is also upbeat on China. “People say it’s a bit risky to put all your eggs in the China basket, but China is going to continue to grow,” says Stephen Halmarick, who helps manage A$150 billion at Sydney-based Colonial First State Global Asset Management. “If we don’t sell to China, someone else will.”

‘Massive Projects’

Halmarick says there’s no sign that the recent global turmoil will slow mining investment in Australia. “There are some massive projects in train in Australia, and they will all go ahead,” he says.

Some of Australia’s resources have even at least partially bucked the downward commodities trend. On Sept. 6, gold hit what was then an all-time high of $1,923.70 per ounce before declining to $1,674 on Oct 12.

Iron ore, at $164.40 a ton, was still 11 percent higher on Oct. 11 than a year earlier and supply shortages will likely support an average price of $181 between 2012 and 2014, Standard Chartered Plc said in a September report.

That’s a far cry from the A$28 a ton that iron ore was selling for in November 2002, when shares in a company then known as Allied Mining & Processing Ltd. were trading at the equivalent of just 0.004 Australian cents.

Allied owned what turned out to be one highly valuable asset: rights to mine in the Pilbara, the richest iron ore region in Australia, where BHP and Rio Tinto had been digging ore for 40 years.

Two Mining Giants

In April 2003, Forrest took control of Allied, renamed it Fortescue and began adding adjoining mining leases on flatland that BHP and Rio Tinto had ignored in favor of the mountains of ore in the nearby Hamersley Range that had appeared more iron rich and accessible.

When the two mining giants refused to let the interloper use their railroad lines, Fortescue raised the money to build its own -- one capable of carrying the heaviest loads ever transported by rail.

This year, trains 2.7 kilometers long will carry 55 million metric tons of ore across 300 kilometers of sun-scorched wilderness to China-bound ships waiting at Port Hedland.

Now, Forrest and his board have entrusted Power with overseeing Fortescue’s next great leap forward: the tripling of production by spending $8.4 billion on the construction of new mines, more heavy-haul rail tracks and a new port.

Tripled in Value

Power says Fortescue will raise half of the funds through regular cash flow and may partly finance the rest by selling shares in Hong Kong or bonds in the U.S.

Surveying what Fortescue has already achieved from 30,000 feet just days before the Diggers confab, Power says that Chinese and other foreign investors, rather than investing in their own mines, should be putting their money into Fortescue shares.

Some already have. In 2009, Chinese steelmaker Hunan Valin Iron & Steel Group Co. paid $1.3 billion for a 17 percent stake in Fortescue -- an investment that had almost tripled in value when it sold about 1 percent of its holding in July.

Russian billionaire Victor Rashnikov’s Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel Works bought 5 percent of Fortescue in 2007 for an undisclosed amount. And in 2006, New York-based investment firm Leucadia National Corp. (LUK) paid $400 million for a 10 percent stake in Fortescue and a 13-year unsecured note that pays a 4 percent royalty on the revenue from some of its mining operations.

‘A Delicious Investment’

Leucadia has since recouped almost $1 billion in share sales and interest and still retains a 5 percent stake valued at an additional A$733 million. It’s involved in a legal dispute with Fortescue over what it claims is an attempt by the company to dilute its royalties by offering other investors similar notes.

Even so, the New York investors are pleased with the returns Fortescue has delivered.

“This is, has and will remain a delicious investment,” Leucadia Chairman Ian Cumming and President Joseph Steinberg said in April in their annual letter to shareholders.

How long it will remain so depends not only on Neville Power’s ability to triple production of iron ore but also on China’s appetite for consuming it.

-- With assistance from Elisabeth Behrmann and Angus Whitley in Sydney, Jason Scott in Perth, Matthew Winkler in Canberra and Helen Yuan in Shanghai. Editors: Stryker McGuire, Michael Serrill

To contact the reporter on this story: William Mellor in Sydney at wmellor@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Laura Colby at lcolby@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Wall Street Sees ‘No Exit’ From Financial Decline as Bankers Fret Future

By Max Abelson - Oct 12, 2011 11:00 AM GMT+0700

Wall Street executives, facing demonstrators camped for a fourth week in New York’s financial district, say they’re anxious and angry for other reasons.

An era of decline and disappointment for bankers may not end for years, according to interviews with more than two dozen executives and investors. Blaming government interference and persecution, they say there isn’t enough global stability, leverage or risk appetite to triumph in the current slump.

“I don’t think it’s a time to make money -- this is a time to rig for survival,” said Charles Stevenson, 64, president of hedge fund Navigator Group Inc. and head of the co-op board at 740 Park Ave. The building, home to Blackstone Group LP Chairman Stephen Schwarzman and CIT Group Inc. Chief Executive Officer John Thain, was among those picketed by protesters yesterday. “The future is not going to be like a past we knew,” he said. “There’s no exit from this morass.”

An anemic global economy, the European sovereign debt crisis, U.S. unemployment stuck above 9 percent and swooning stock markets have sapped the euphoria that swept Wall Street in 2009 as it rebounded to record profits after the credit crisis. The benefits of a $700 billion taxpayer bailout and $1.2 trillion in emergency funding from the Federal Reserve have faded. Next week Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) may report its second quarterly loss per share since going public in 1999, according to the average estimate of 26 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.

‘Financial Bubble’

“They’re not going to make the kind of money they wanted,” said William Hambrecht, chairman of San Francisco- based WR Hambrecht & Co., who designed the Dutch auction of Google Inc.’s 2004 initial public offering. “I’m not sure people really have come to terms with the fact that what we had was a financial bubble.”

New rules from the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision will more than double capital requirements for banks. Fixed- income revenue could fall 25 percent under a draft of the Volcker rule, which may outlaw so-called flow trading, according to an Oct. 10 note from Brad Hintz, a Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. analyst. Leverage has been cut by more than half at banks including Goldman Sachs and UBS AG, and an Oliver Wyman and Morgan Stanley (MS) report estimates that regulation may reduce returns on equity by 4 to 6 percentage points.

The new rules are the result of “societal objectives of a populist administration in Washington,” private-equity investor Wilbur Ross said in an e-mail. John Phelan, co-founder of MSD Capital LP, a New York-based fund that manages assets for billionaire Michael Dell, said “the whole capitalist system is being called into question.”

‘Ways to Profiteer’

Not everyone is worried about the banks.

“I wouldn’t shed too many tears for Wall Street,” Neil Barofsky, 41, the former special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program who is now teaching a class on the financial crisis at New York University School of Law, wrote in an e-mail. “The systemic advantage that the too-big-to-fail banks enjoyed in the lead-up to the financial crisis may be diminished in the near term, but the structure is still essentially the same and will almost certainly help catapult them to record profits and bonuses once the good times return.”

Ross, 73, the billionaire chairman of New York-based WL Ross & Co., said Wall Street’s “inherent ingenuity” shouldn’t be discounted and that “the history of the investment community shows that it will find ways to profiteer.”

Others identified potential financial bright spots, including so-called black-swan and tail-risk funds designed to protect against market shocks. One black-swan fund, Universa Investments LP, whose Santa Monica, California, office features a Japanese print of a wave about to break over fishermen, produced returns of 20 percent to 25 percent this year, through August, according to a person familiar with the matter.

‘More Secular’

Still, almost all corners of Wall Street are suffering. James Staley, head of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)’s investment bank, estimated last month that third-quarter trading revenue may drop by 30 percent and investment-banking fees by 50 percent. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index had its worst decline in the quarter since 2008, and Brent crude-oil futures saw their longest slump. The average yields demanded on U.S. commercial-mortgage bonds in excess of Treasuries climbed the most in three years.

“Unlike some other slowdowns, this feels more secular,” said Wilson Ervin, a Credit Suisse Group AG senior adviser who stepped down as chief risk officer in 2009.

‘Recalibrated’ Compensation

While there had been “an understandable path” out of the turmoil of 2008, there’s a more encompassing uncertainty now, said Frederick Lane, vice chairman of investment banking at St. Petersburg, Florida-based Raymond James Financial Inc.

“There’s going to be some disillusionment, similar to physicians,” said Lane, 62. “The notion that somehow going to medical school would deliver you substantial wealth and prestige is no longer true.”

Ilana Weinstein, CEO of search firm IDW Group LLC, said in an interview that she had nothing good to offer a trading executive in his early 40s who complained last month about morale at his bank, one of the six largest in the U.S.

“This is the first time that people don’t necessarily believe it will get better,” said Weinstein, whose Third Avenue office has two exits “like a high-end plastic surgeon” to assure discretion. “Compensation has been recalibrated.”

Michael Karp, 42, CEO of New York-based recruitment firm Options Group Inc., said Wall Street pay will fall 30 percent this year, and more for executives. It will be flat or down even in businesses doing relatively well, such as emerging markets and commodities, he said.

Job Cuts

Those are the survivors. The biggest global banks already had been cutting jobs at the fastest rate since 2008 when Bank of America Corp. (BAC) said last month that it will eliminate 30,000 positions. London-based HSBC Holdings Plc, Europe’s largest lender, aims to shed the same amount. UBS, Switzerland’s biggest bank, is shrinking after a $2.3 billion trading loss.

“Sharply” falling profits will lead to almost 10,000 financial-services job cuts in New York City by the end of 2012, according to a report released yesterday by New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli. The prospects for Wall Street “have cooled considerably,” he said in a statement.

“The stress levels are getting very high,” said MSD Capital’s Phelan.

The 46-year-old hedge-fund manager said the current aversion to risk across Wall Street could jeopardize profits.

“It’s one of the things I struggle with: Everybody’s risk- off, so should I be risk-on?” he said. “There are so many things I have to worry about.”

Two former Goldman Sachs managing directors who asked not to be identified because they weren’t authorized by their current firms to speak, one a former management committee member and the other a trading head, also said they were worried that investment bankers have lost their appetite for risk.

Torrisi Italian Specialties

Uncertainty didn’t stop some on Wall Street from profiting during the U.S. housing collapse, when Deutsche Bank AG trader Greg Lippmann helped create and profited from a multibillion- dollar market in subprime-based derivatives. He said Wall Street will have fewer exotic products to sell and trade, drawing an analogy to the popular no-reservations restaurant Torrisi Italian Specialties.

“No choosing, great food, low price, no pizzazz,” said Lippmann, co-founder of New York hedge fund LibreMax Capital LLC. “A couple of years ago, the hottest place to go would be someplace that they just spent $5 million decorating and they’ve got three or four models answering the phones. People want stripped-down now.”

‘Everybody Hates Me’

That isn’t diminishing lobbying efforts to soften rules mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act, which would reduce risk, curtail proprietary trading and force more transparency in the $601 trillion derivatives market. Large financial institutions have been “exceedingly aggressive at trying to roll back reform” and have largely succeeded, said Greenlight Capital Inc. President David Einhorn, 42, who bet against Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in the months before that firm’s collapse.

Leon Cooperman, the first Goldman Sachs Asset Management CEO and head of hedge fund Omega Advisors Inc. in New York, said Wall Street has been “excessively” blamed and President Barack Obama has “continued to project himself as anti-wealth, anti- business and socialist in his leanings.”

Phelan said he’s worried about “social unrest.”

“My taxes are going up,” he said. “Everybody hates me. I have two friends who bought land in New Zealand. They’re trying to convince me to go.”

He isn’t planning to visit.

“I’m not one of those extreme people,” he said.

Occupy Wall Street

A version of that social unrest is taking place in lower Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park, where Occupy Wall Street protests against bank bailouts and income inequality have gained support from Nobel Prize-winning economists Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman. On Oct. 1, police halted a march over the Brooklyn Bridge, arresting about 700, and have used pepper spray.

“We have too many regulations stopping democracy and not enough regulations stopping Wall Street from misbehaving,” Stiglitz, an economics professor at Columbia University, told protesters the next day. “We are bearing the cost of their misdeeds. There’s a system where we’ve socialized losses and privatized gains. That’s not capitalism.”

Bankers aren’t optimistic about those gains. Options Group’s Karp said he met last month over tea at the Gramercy Park Hotel in New York with a trader who made $500,000 last year at one of the six largest U.S. banks.

The trader, a 27-year-old Ivy League graduate, complained that he has worked harder this year and will be paid less. The headhunter told him to stay put and collect his bonus.

“This is very demoralizing to people,” Karp said. “Especially young guys who have gone to college and wanted to come onto the Street, having dreams of becoming millionaires.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Max Abelson in New York at mabelson@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: David Scheer at dscheer@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Google Is Said Not to Plan Akamai Takeover After Report Raised Speculation

By Brian Womack - Oct 13, 2011 11:01 AM GMT+0700

Google Inc. (GOOG) isn’t planning to acquire Akamai Technologies Inc. (AKAM), two people familiar with the matter said, countering a report in Business Insider that fueled speculation a takeover may be imminent.

The story, which sparked an after-hours surge of as much as 17 percent in Akamai stock, is baseless, said the people, who asked not to be identified. Several people in the advertising technology industry “think Google is about to buy Akamai,” Business Insider reported earlier yesterday.

“It’s mostly just a rumor,” according to the report.

Akamai, which speeds delivery of online content for such customers as Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Netflix Inc. (NFLX), was the subject of more buyout rumors than any other American company from 2005 through 2010, data compiled by Bloomberg show. It was named as a target 21 times by electronic news services, brokerages or newspapers, according to the data.

Weakness in Akamai shares -- it has slumped 50 percent this year -- means the company may be more alluring to acquirers. The company could attract interest from International Business Machines Corp., which is hunting for takeovers, or Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ), co-owner of the largest U.S. wireless operator, analysts at Blaylock Robert Van LLC and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Inc. said earlier this month.

Representatives of Mountain View, California-based Google and Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Akamai declined to comment.

Akamai shares rose as high as $27.35 after the report, before paring the gains. The stock had been little changed at $23.37 in regular New York trading.

To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Womack in San Francisco at bwomack1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net




Read more...

‘Buffett Rule’ May Be Broken by 25% of Millionaire Taxpayers, Study Finds

By Andrew Zajac - Oct 13, 2011 4:03 AM GMT+0700

About 25 percent of millionaires in the U.S. pay federal taxes at lower effective rates than a significant portion of middle-income taxpayers, according to a legislative analysis.

Preferential treatment of investment income and the reduced impact of payroll taxes on high earners lets about 94,500 millionaires pay taxes at a lower rate than 10.4 million “moderate-income taxpayers,” representing about 10 percent of those making less than $100,000 a year, according to the report by the non-partisan Congressional Research Service dated Oct. 7.

The findings put the U.S. tax system in conflict with the so-called Buffett Rule, which says households making more than $1 million annually shouldn’t pay a smaller share of their income in taxes than middle class families, says the report, which analyzed 2006 Internal Revenue Service data.

The Buffett principle was proposed by President Barack Obama in September after billionaire Warren Buffett, the 81- year-old chairman and chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., said it was wrong that he paid taxes at a lower rate than 20 other people who worked in his office.

Obama has said the Buffett Rule should be a guiding principle of efforts to reform the U.S. tax code.

The Buffett maxim and broader proposals by Obama and Democrats to raise taxes on the rich have been criticized as “class warfare” by some congressional Republicans.

Voluntary Tax Payments

On Oct. 5, Louisiana Republican Representative Steve Scalise introduced H.R. 3099, the Buffett Rule Act of 2011, which would authorize the IRS to print a box on tax returns that filers may check if they want to voluntarily pay more tax.

Earlier this month, Senate Democrats proposed paying for Obama’s $447 billion jobs package with a 5.6 percent surtax on individual incomes exceeding $1 million. The jobs plan was sidetracked by the Senate yesterday after falling short of the 60 votes it needed to advance.

Yesterday, Buffett declined the request of a Republican congressman to swap tax returns and reiterated his pledge to publish the form if other billionaires would do the same.

The Congressional Research Service report found that, on average, millionaires paid federal tax at a 30 percent rate, while moderate-income taxpayers, defined as those earning less than $100,000, were taxed at 19 percent.

The overall average, though, “obscures a great deal of variation,” including the finding that 25 percent of millionaires pay lower rates than 10 percent of moderate earners, the report found.

The findings “would be considered a violation of the Buffett Rule, but not to the extent alluded to by Mr. Buffett,” the report says.

Payroll Taxes

The report says moderate-income taxpayers bear the brunt of the Social Security payroll tax because it applies only to the first $106,800 in wages.

The tax is set at 12.4 percent, split equally between workers and employers. The portion of the tax that employees pay was temporarily cut to 4.2 percent in last December’s tax bill. Obama’s jobs plan proposes another temporary measure that would reduce the employee share to 3.1 percent and cut an employer’s share to 3.1 percent on the first $5 million of payroll. An additional 2.9 percent tax for Medicare is levied on all wages.

In addition, the report says, a significant portion of millionaires derive income from dividends, capital gains or carried interest, all taxed at 15 percent. Ordinary income is taxed at rates ranging from 10 percent for low earners to a top marginal rate of 35 percent.

The report found that a relatively small proportion of business owners are millionaires and played down the impact of higher tax rates on job creation.

“The small share of taxpayers with small-business income in the millionaire category suggests that tax reform policies designed to ensure adherence to the Buffett Rule will affect few small businesses,” the report says.

The findings of the CRS study are similar to an analysis last month by the non-profit Citizens for Tax Justice, a labor- funded research group based in Washington.

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Zajac in Washington at azajac@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jodi Schneider at jschneider50@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Google Said Not to Plan Acquisition of Akamai

By Brian Womack - Oct 13, 2011 5:52 AM GMT+0700

Google Inc. (GOOG) isn’t planning to acquire Akamai Technologies Inc. (AKAM), two people familiar with the matter said, countering a report in Business Insider that fueled speculation a takeover may be imminent.

The story, which sparked an after-hours surge of as much as 17 percent in Akamai stock, is baseless, said the people, who asked not to be identified. Several people in the advertising technology industry “think Google is about to buy Akamai,” Business Insider reported earlier today.

“It’s mostly just a rumor,” according to the report.

Akamai, which supplies the computer power that speeds delivery of content for such customers as Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Netflix Inc. (NFLX), was the subject of more buyout rumors than any other American company from 2005 through 2010, data compiled by Bloomberg show. It was named as a target 21 times by electronic news services, brokerages or newspapers, according to the data.

Weakness in Akamai shares -- it has slumped 50 percent this year -- means the company may be more alluring. The company could attract acquisition interest from International Business Machines Corp., which is hunting for takeovers, or Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ), owner of the largest U.S. wireless operator, analysts at Blaylock Robert Van LLC and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Inc. said earlier this month.

Representatives of Mountain View, California-based Google and Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Akamai, declined to comment.

Akamai pared its late-trading surge, and was at $23.99 as of 6:30 p.m. New York time. It had risen to as high as $27.35 after the report. It had been little changed at $23.37 in regular trading.

Editors: Tom Giles, Nick Turner.

To contact the reporter on this story: Brian Womack in San Francisco at bwomack1@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Apple Wins Ban on Samsung Tablet in Australia

By Jacob Greber and Joe Schneider - Oct 13, 2011 8:30 AM GMT+0700

Samsung Electronics Co. lost a bid to sell its newest tablet computer in Australia until after a patent dispute with Apple Inc. (AAPL) is settled, a decision that means the product may never come to market in the country.

Federal Court Justice Annabelle Bennett today granted Apple’s request for an injunction barring the sale of the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia until the two companies’ patent dispute is resolved following a trial.

Samsung had said it would scrap the release of the Galaxy 10.1 if the injunction was granted because missing the Christmas season would make the new tablet “dead” by the time it reached market, Neil Young, a lawyer representing the Suwon, South Korea-based company, told Bennett in Sydney on Oct. 4.

Apple claims the Samsung tablet infringes at least three patents, and its litigation had delayed the release of the Galaxy 10.1 for more than two months in Australia. The dispute is part of a larger battle between the two companies that spans four continents and began in April, when Apple sued in the U.S. and claimed Samsung’s Galaxy products “slavishly” copied the designs of iPhones and iPads.

A German court temporarily banned sales of Galaxy tablets in August, a ruling Samsung has appealed. The two companies are also involved in legal disputes in South Korea, Japan and the Netherlands.

Young said earlier this month that technology changes so quickly that even another month’s delay in the release of the Galaxy 10.1 would threaten the product’s sales prospects. Samsung had offered to agree to a quick trial on Apple’s patent claim if Apple agreed to drop its demand for a ban on the sale of the Galaxy 10.1, Young said. Apple rejected the proposal, he said.

Samsung said a trial can’t be held until next year because it must collect evidence.

The case is: Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. NSD1243/2011. Federal Court of Australia (Sydney).

To contact the reporters on this story: Jacob Greber in Sydney at jgreber@bloomberg.net; Joe Schneider in Sydney at jschneider5@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Anand Krishnamoorthy at anandk@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Dow Erases 2011 Decline on Europe’s Plan

By Rita Nazareth - Oct 13, 2011 4:20 AM GMT+0700
Enlarge image Dow Erases 2011 Decline on Europe’s Plan

Traders Mark Lodewick, center, and Peter Tuchman, work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange on Oct. 11, 2011. Photographer: Richard Drew/AP

Oct. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Bloomberg's Deborah Kostroun reports on the performance of the U.S. equity market today. U.S. stocks rose, briefly erasing the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s 2011 loss, as European leaders provided a road map to tame the debt crisis and the Federal Reserve said it discussed further asset purchases. Bloomberg's Pimm Fox also speaks. (Source: Bloomberg)


U.S. stocks rose, briefly erasing the Dow Jones Industrial Average’s 2011 loss, as European leaders provided a road map to tame the debt crisis and the Federal Reserve said it discussed further asset purchases.

Financial and industrial shares rose the most among 10 groups in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Bank of America Corp. (BAC) jumped at least 2.7 percent, following a rally in European lenders. General Electric Co. (GE) and 3M Co. (MMM) added more than 1.6 percent to pace gains among companies most- reliant on economic growth. PepsiCo Inc., the largest snack-food maker, increased 2.9 percent as profit beat analysts’ estimates.

The S&P 500 advanced 1 percent to 1,207.25 at 4 p.m. New York time, rallying 4.5 percent in three days. The index rose as much as 2.1 percent earlier before paring gains in the final hour of trading. The Dow climbed 102.55 points, or 0.9 percent, to 11,518.85. The 30-stock gauge is down 0.5 percent for 2011.

“The market doesn’t want to turn back lower,” Liam Dalton, chief executive officer of Axiom Capital Management Inc., in New York, which oversees $1.8 billion, said in a telephone interview. “The process in Europe is likely to be resolved. There are a lot of things that can go right or wrong. Still, we’re building off of what looks like an oversold low.”

The Dow has gained 8.1 percent since reaching this year’s closing low on Oct. 3 amid optimism European leaders will tame the region’s debt crisis and after American economic data improved. Before that, the gauge had slumped as much as 17 percent from this year’s high on April 29 amid concern that Europe’s crisis would slow down the economic recovery.

Trading Range

The S&P 500 had the biggest rally over seven days since March 2009, climbing 9.8 percent. The rebound has yet to bring the S&P 500 out of a trading range it’s been stuck in for more than two months. The benchmark index for U.S. stocks has fluctuated between 1,074.77 and 1,230.71 since Aug. 5 as investors remained cautious toward riskier assets amid speculation Greece will default on its debt.

“It feels like Charlie Brown and Lucy every time she put a football in front of him,” James Dunigan, who helps oversee $109 billion as chief investment officer in Philadelphia for PNC Wealth Management, said in a telephone interview. Cartoon character Charlie Brown is a perpetual loser in football and other pursuits. “Maybe the worst case scenario is off the table in Europe. Still, the question is -- whatever they do, will it be enough? I’m not sure I’m ready to declare victory yet.”

‘Coordinated Approach’

Global stocks rose today as European Commission President Jose Barroso called for a reinforcement of crisis-hit banks, the payout of a sixth loan to Greece and a faster start for a permanent rescue fund to master Europe’s debt woes. Barroso urged a “coordinated approach” to deliver a “significantly higher capital ratio of highest quality capital” for banks, while offering government funds only as a last resort.

Some Federal Reserve officials last month wanted to keep further asset purchases as an option to boost the economy as policy makers saw “considerable uncertainty” that U.S. growth will pick up, the Fed said today in minutes of the Sept. 20-21 session. The debate culminated in the Federal Open Market Committee’s decision to replace $400 billion of Treasuries in the central bank’s portfolio with longer-term debt to reduce borrowing costs.

“We’re believers that we’re probably going to avoid a recession,” Warren Koontz, head of U.S. large-cap value stocks at Loomis Sayles & Co. in Boston, which manages $150 billion, said in a telephone interview. “If people come to realize that economic growth isn’t as poor as sentiment or as stock prices have indicated, we probably could create some type of bottom.”

Most-Tied

The Morgan Stanley Cyclical Index of companies most-tied to economic growth added 2 percent. The Dow Jones Transportation Average rose 1.3 percent. The KBW Bank Index (BKX) gained 3.3 percent. Bank of America added 3.3 percent to $6.58. JPMorgan gained 2.8 percent to $33.20. GE increased 1.6 percent to $16.40. 3M rallied 2.5 percent to $78.36.

PepsiCo jumped 2.9 percent to $62.70 after saying third- quarter profit rose 4.1 percent as sales of Frito-Lay products increased. Chief Executive Officer Indra Nooyi created a council in September to better coordinate sales of snacks and beverages after the company reduced its full-year profit forecast.

“The reason we’re bullish and why we’re having a different view of the market is because we’ve had a lot more faith in the ability of U.S. corporations and the U.S. economy to still navigate through a U.S. expansion, despite what looks like very, very scary headlines,” Thomas Lee, the chief U.S. equity strategist at JPMorgan, said in an interview on Bloomberg Television “In the Loop” with Betty Liu.

Liz Claiborne Soars

Liz Claiborne Inc. (LIZ) surged 34 percent, the most since 1987, to $6.84 after agreeing to sell its namesake and Monet brands to J.C. Penney Co. and its Kensie line to Bluestar Alliance as the company works to reduce debt. The transactions and the completion of the sale of Dana Buchman brand to Kohl’s Corp. (KSS) are worth a total of $328 million in cash.

Alcoa Inc. (AA) fell 2.4 percent to $10.05. The first company in the Dow to report earnings this quarter posted profit that trailed estimates, saying European customers “dramatically” cut orders on economic uncertainty. Alcoa is grappling with rising production costs while the price of aluminum on the London Metal Exchange has fallen in the past two months.

Earnings per share for the S&P 500, excluding financial companies, rose 14 percent in the third quarter, according to analysts’ estimates compiled by Bloomberg. Still, it’s the smallest gain since the end of 2009, the data showed.

UBS AG raised its 2011 earnings forecast for companies in the S&P 500, citing stronger-than-forecast U.S. economic data. Thomas Doerflinger, a New York-based strategist, raised his profit estimate for the benchmark index to $96.64 a share from $95, saying earnings in the second half of the year will reflect higher economic growth expectations after U.S. manufacturing, auto sales, construction and payrolls data beat forecasts.

To contact the reporter on this story: Rita Nazareth in New York at rnazareth@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Nick Baker at nbaker7@bloomberg.net



Read more...

Obama Consumer Watchdog Said to Have Known About Bank of America Debit Fee

By Hugh Son - Oct 13, 2011 2:53 AM GMT+0700

The Obama administration’s new consumer watchdog knew about Bank of America Corp. (BAC)’s plan to impose a $5 monthly debit-card fee at least two weeks before the firm’s announcement ignited a public firestorm, said people briefed on the discussions.

The lender met with Consumer Financial Protection Bureau officials on Sept. 16 to inform them of the fee, Susan Faulkner, head of consumer banking products, told employees yesterday at a gathering in Delaware, said two people who attended. They asked for anonymity because the event was private. Faulkner said the regulator didn’t oppose the fee, according to one of the people.

Bank of America set off a backlash last month when it announced plans to charge some customers for using debit cards, with President Barack Obama among the lead critics. He reprimanded the Charlotte, North Carolina-based firm on Oct. 3, saying that banks didn’t have an “inherent right” to profits and that the added fees are “exactly why we need somebody whose sole job it is to prevent this kind of stuff from happening.”

Obama later said that while banks have the right to impose the fee, it wasn’t fair to consumers.

Regulators “may have been out of touch, like Bank of America was, about how customers would react to this fee,” said Gerald Bell, a professor at UNC-Chapel Hill’s Kenan-Flagler Business School. The question is, “Did they somehow not execute the president’s strategy, or did they just agree with Bank of America that this wasn’t anything out of the ordinary?”

Didn’t ‘Bless’ Fee

Bank of America, the biggest U.S. lender by assets as of midyear, went ahead with the fee after competitors including Regions Financial Corp. (RF) and SunTrust Banks Inc. (STI) imposed similar charges, David Darnell, the bank’s co-chief operating officer, said at yesterday’s gathering, according to the people.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau didn’t “bless this or any other fee,” said Jennifer Howard, a spokeswoman for the regulator. “That simply isn’t our role. Nor is it our role to advise banks on whether the public would readily accept a new fee.”

Faulkner, 49, who reports to Darnell, 58, told the group she was surprised at how well the meeting with regulators went, one of the people said. Still, the bank could have done a better job of informing the public about who will have to pay the fees, Faulkner told employees.

Who’s Exempt

Clients with at least $20,000, a Bank of America mortgage or accounts linked to the Merrill Lynch brokerage aren’t affected. Small-business and military customers are also exempt. Customers will be charged once a month for making debit-card purchases, and won’t be penalized if they don’t use the card or use it only for cash-machine withdrawals.

The banking industry has pointed to Senator Richard Durbin, the Illinois Democrat whose legislation reduced so-called swipe fees by about half, as the reason for the new fees. Durbin has said that banks still “profit handsomely” from debit transactions.

The bank’s internal gathering in Delaware included about 200 employees, the people said. Tony Allen, a company spokesman, confirmed the company held a town-hall style meeting yesterday and declined to elaborate. “Our leaders do a lot of market visits of this nature across the country,” Allen said.

While rivals including JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. previously said they were testing ways to recoup revenue lost because of new U.S. limits on debit transactions, Bank of America’s Sept. 29 announcement galvanized consumer discontent, said Bert Ely, a banking consultant in Alexandria, Virginia.

Symbolic Role

“Bank of America has become the symbol of what people don’t like about financial institutions,” Ely said. “They misjudged the extent that they personify a lot of what people don’t like about banks.”

The fee fueled demonstrations in Los Angeles and prompted a Washington, D.C., woman to collect more than 150,000 petitions in protest. Representative Brad Miller, a North Carolina Democrat and member of the Financial Services Committee, condemned “unrepentant” lenders this month and introduced a bill that would make it easier to switch banks.

Obama said Oct. 3 that his nascent consumer bureau, created by the Dodd-Frank Act, could prevent banks from imposing new fees. He stepped back from those comments in subsequent interviews.

“The argument they’ve made is, ‘Well, you know what, this hidden fee was prohibited so we’ll find another fee to make up for it,’” Obama said on Oct. 6. “Now, they have that right, but it’s not a good practice. It’s not necessarily fair to consumers.”

Awaiting Director’s Confirmation

The consumer bureau, which officially started operating in July, awaits the Senate confirmation of its director, Richard Cordray. Republicans have vowed to oppose approving Obama’s nominee until changes are made to the agency.

Consumers should be able to easily compare costs across banks, the bureau said in an Oct. 5 release that specified that it wasn’t addressing “any one fee from any one bank.”

Chief Executive Officer Brian T. Moynihan, 52, is streamlining the firm, which swelled to become the biggest U.S. lender after more than $130 billion in acquisitions by his predecessor, Kenneth D. Lewis. Moynihan agreed to sell almost $50 billion in assets and units and said that he would trim $5 billion in expenses, mostly by eliminating 30,000 consumer- banking jobs.

Yesterday, Darnell likened efforts to dispose of non-core assets to cleaning a garage that became full over the years, according to the people.

To contact the reporter on this story: Hugh Son in New York at hson1@bloomberg.net;

To contact the editors responsible for this story: David Scheer at dscheer@bloomberg.net; Rick Green at rgreen18@bloomberg.net.




Read more...

Goldman May Drop Bank Status to Sidestep Volcker Rule Costs, Hilder Says

By Michael J. Moore - Oct 13, 2011 3:44 AM GMT+0700

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and Morgan Stanley may consider dropping their status as bank holding companies to avoid expenses tied to the Volcker rule, said David Hilder, an analyst at Susquehanna Financial Group LLP.

The rule in its current form would impose costs on lenders and drive capital to non-bank market makers, causing the two New York-based firms to consider whether to stop being banks, Hilder said in a note yesterday, when four regulatory agencies issued a 298-page draft of the rule for public comment.

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley were the biggest U.S. securities firms before they converted to bank holding companies after the September 2008 bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Both became subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve and won access to central bank programs such as the discount window, which are designed to protect deposit-taking banks.

“The regulators have proposed a massive new compliance burden on banks to prove that their market-making activities are just that, and not proprietary trading in disguise,” wrote Hilder, who’s based in New York. “If these regulations are adopted in anything close to their proposed form, there will be large additional costs imposed on banks as market-makers that will not apply to market-makers not owned by banks.”

David Konrad, a bank analyst at KBW Inc., said Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley (MS) are unlikely to change their status as bank holding companies to dodge the Volcker restrictions.

‘Protecting Deposits’

“If they tried to do that, Congress would amend the rule to say systemically important banks rather than bank holding companies,” Konrad said in a phone interview. “This is part protecting deposits, but also part too-big-to-fail. I don’t think there’s any interest from the investment banks in doing that, and I don’t think it would serve that purpose.”

Goldman Sachs Chief Financial Officer David Viniar said Jan. 21, 2010, the same day President Barack Obama announced his support for the Volcker rule, that it was “unrealistic” to imagine the firm won’t be a federally supervised bank.

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley made “modest profits” from pure proprietary trading, which is why they willingly shut down those desks, David Trone, an analyst at JMP Securities, wrote in a note today. The rule’s draft indicates regulators won’t interfere with customer flow trading, he wrote.

Goldman Sachs may be hurt by provisions that limit investments in hedge funds and private equity, Trone wrote. Had those restrictions been in place in recent years, they would have cost the firm about $700 million, or 9 percent, of annual earnings, he wrote.

‘Crown Jewel’ Businesses

The rule, named for former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker, was included in last year’s regulatory overhaul to rein in risky trading that helped fuel the 2008 credit crisis. The central bank, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency worked with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the draft issued yesterday.

Morgan Stanley climbed 45 cents, or 2.9 percent, to $15.84 in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. Goldman Sachs advanced 2.5 percent to $99.11.

Increased regulation and capital rules may mean the largest banks have to split off some “crown jewel” businesses, said Roy Smith, a finance professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business and a former Goldman Sachs partner.

“You have to ask which parts of the business are they simply not going to be able to continue to do or maintain the talented people who do it because those guys would have better options if they left the firm and went to a hedge fund,” Smith said. “You don’t want to be left with the third team running your expensive market-making trading desk.”

It’s too soon to say whether banks affected by the rule would have to break up to remain competitive and the costs of the proposal are likely to shift some business to smaller players, Glenn Schorr, a Nomura Holdings Inc. analyst, wrote in a note today. Companies and investors are likely to push back during the comment period to “dial back” some parts of the rule, he wrote.

Stephen Cohen, a Goldman Sachs spokesman, and Morgan Stanley’s Mark Lake declined to comment.

To contact the reporter on this story: Michael J. Moore in New York at mmoore55@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: David Scheer at dscheer@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Some Millionaires May Break ‘Buffett Rule’: Study

By Andrew Zajac - Oct 13, 2011 4:03 AM GMT+0700

About 25 percent of millionaires in the U.S. pay federal taxes at lower effective rates than a significant portion of middle-income taxpayers, according to a legislative analysis.

Preferential treatment of investment income and the reduced impact of payroll taxes on high earners lets about 94,500 millionaires pay taxes at a lower rate than 10.4 million “moderate-income taxpayers,” representing about 10 percent of those making less than $100,000 a year, according to the report by the non-partisan Congressional Research Service dated Oct. 7.

The findings put the U.S. tax system in conflict with the so-called Buffett Rule, which says households making more than $1 million annually shouldn’t pay a smaller share of their income in taxes than middle class families, says the report, which analyzed 2006 Internal Revenue Service data.

The Buffett principle was proposed by President Barack Obama in September after billionaire Warren Buffett, the 81- year-old chairman and chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., said it was wrong that he paid taxes at a lower rate than 20 other people who worked in his office.

Obama has said the Buffett Rule should be a guiding principle of efforts to reform the U.S. tax code.

The Buffett maxim and broader proposals by Obama and Democrats to raise taxes on the rich have been criticized as “class warfare” by some congressional Republicans.

Voluntary Tax Payments

On Oct. 5, Louisiana Republican Representative Steve Scalise introduced H.R. 3099, the Buffett Rule Act of 2011, which would authorize the IRS to print a box on tax returns that filers may check if they want to voluntarily pay more tax.

Earlier this month, Senate Democrats proposed paying for Obama’s $447 billion jobs package with a 5.6 percent surtax on individual incomes exceeding $1 million. The jobs plan was sidetracked by the Senate yesterday after falling short of the 60 votes it needed to advance.

Yesterday, Buffett declined the request of a Republican congressman to swap tax returns and reiterated his pledge to publish the form if other billionaires would do the same.

The Congressional Research Service report found that, on average, millionaires paid federal tax at a 30 percent rate, while moderate-income taxpayers, defined as those earning less than $100,000, were taxed at 19 percent.

The overall average, though, “obscures a great deal of variation,” including the finding that 25 percent of millionaires pay lower rates than 10 percent of moderate earners, the report found.

The findings “would be considered a violation of the Buffett Rule, but not to the extent alluded to by Mr. Buffett,” the report says.

Payroll Taxes

The report says moderate-income taxpayers bear the brunt of the Social Security payroll tax because it applies only to the first $106,800 in wages.

The tax is set at 12.4 percent, split equally between workers and employers. The portion of the tax that employees pay was temporarily cut to 4.2 percent in last December’s tax bill. Obama’s jobs plan proposes another temporary measure that would reduce the employee share to 3.1 percent and cut an employer’s share to 3.1 percent on the first $5 million of payroll. An additional 2.9 percent tax for Medicare is levied on all wages.

In addition, the report says, a significant portion of millionaires derive income from dividends, capital gains or carried interest, all taxed at 15 percent. Ordinary income is taxed at rates ranging from 10 percent for low earners to a top marginal rate of 35 percent.

The report found that a relatively small proportion of business owners are millionaires and played down the impact of higher tax rates on job creation.

“The small share of taxpayers with small-business income in the millionaire category suggests that tax reform policies designed to ensure adherence to the Buffett Rule will affect few small businesses,” the report says.

The findings of the CRS study are similar to an analysis last month by the non-profit Citizens for Tax Justice, a labor- funded research group based in Washington.

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Zajac in Washington at azajac@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Jodi Schneider at jschneider50@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Some Fed Officials Sought to Retain QE3 Option

By Scott Lanman and Craig Torres - Oct 13, 2011 3:45 AM GMT+0700
Enlarge image Ben Bernanke

Ben S. Bernanke, chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, listens during a Joint Economic Committee hearing in Washington on Oct. 4, 2011. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

Oct. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Michael Moran, chief economist at Daiwa Capital Markets America Inc., talks about Federal Reserve policy. Most participants favored giving additional information on the central bank’s goals and how they influence the Fed’s decisions, and most "saw advantages" in tying the Fed’s near-zero interest rates to more-specific developments in the economy, the Fed said in minutes of the Sept. 20-21 Federal Open Market Committee meeting, released today in Washington. Moran speaks with Mark Crumpton on Bloomberg Television's "Bottom Line." (Source: Bloomberg)


The Federal Reserve said some officials last month wanted to keep further asset purchases as an option to boost the economy as policy makers saw “considerable uncertainty” that U.S. growth will pick up.

Most participants favored giving additional information on the central bank’s goals and how they influence the Fed’s decisions, and most “saw advantages” in tying the Fed’s near- zero interest rates to more specific developments in the economy, the Fed said in minutes of the Sept. 20-21 session, released today in Washington. Such changes may be expressed in ways other than the post-meeting statement, the Fed said.

The debate culminated in the Federal Open Market Committee’s decision to replace $400 billion of Treasuries in the central bank’s portfolio with longer-term debt to reduce borrowing costs. Three officials dissented. Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said last week the so-called Operation Twist program is a “significant step but not a game changer” for reviving growth and reducing unemployment stuck near 9 percent.

“A number of participants saw large-scale asset purchases as potentially a more potent tool that should be retained as an option in the event that further policy action to support a stronger economic recovery was warranted,” the minutes said.

Policy makers also decided on Sept. 21 to reinvest maturing housing debt into mortgage-backed securities in part to keep the Fed’s Treasury holdings from getting too large and possibly causing a “deterioration in Treasury market functioning,” the minutes said.

Benchmark Interest Rate

The FOMC left its benchmark rate in a range of zero to 0.25 percent, where it’s been since December 2008, and reiterated its language from its August meeting that the rate is likely to stay very low through at least mid-2013.

The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index of stocks pared gains, rising 1 percent to 1,207.25 at 4:41 p.m. in New York. Yields on 10-year Treasuries climbed 6 basis points, or 0.06 percentage point, to 2.21 percent.

Fed officials also considered a weaker version of Operation Twist that would reinvest principal payments on housing debt exclusively in long-term Treasury securities, the minutes said. Policy makers discussed lowering the 0.25 percent interest rate paid on banks’ reserve deposits with the Fed; many officials expressed concern that such a move “risked costly disruptions to money markets and to the intermediation of credit.”

Third Round

Additional asset purchases would constitute a third round of so-called quantitative easing after the Fed bought $2.3 trillion in housing and government debt in two rounds from December 2008 to June 2011. Some officials said expanding the Fed’s balance sheet further “would be more likely to raise inflation and inflation expectations than to stimulate economic activity and argued that such tools should be reserved for circumstances in which the risk of deflation was elevated,” the minutes said.

Philadelphia Fed President Charles Plosser, one of the dissenters, said after a speech today in Philadelphia that the threat of deflation would warrant more stimulus. He said Operation Twist won’t have a “major impact” on the speed of the economic recovery and that he expects U.S. growth to “gradually accelerate” to about 3 percent next year.

As for the option of additional asset purchases, “it’s there, it’s possible, but it’s a high hurdle,” Michael Moran, chief economist at Daiwa Capital Markets America Inc. in New York, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. “Most FOMC members are going to view that as a tool that should be reserved for if the economy were to start to decline or if we were to get into a situation where deflation is a risk,” he said.

Specific Levels

At the August meeting, Bernanke and colleagues discussed adopting specific levels of inflation and unemployment as conditions for keeping interest rates near zero. Only Chicago Fed President Charles Evans has publicly supported the idea of allowing price increases faster than 2 percent annually as a way to lower unemployment.

The September minutes said that most participants “favored taking steps to increase further the transparency of monetary policy.” Some committee members said it would be “useful” to clarify the link between monetary-policy decisions in the short term and longer-run objectives.

Unemployment Objective

A number of participants “expressed concerns” about communicating an objective for the unemployment rate because of monetary policy’s indirect influence over labor markets. The Fed panel agreed that the long-run rate of inflation is determined by monetary policy. The minutes stopped short of saying the Fed was prepared to set an explicit inflation target.

“Participants generally saw the committee’s post-meeting statements as not well suited to communicate fully the committee’s thinking about its objectives and its policy framework,” the minutes said. They agreed that they would need to use “other means” to supplement the statement, without specifying what those could be.

The Fed also discussed giving more information on the conditions under which interest rates would stay close to zero, which could make the statement “more effective” and provoke a more favorable response in financial markets, the minutes said.

Several officials saw a risk that such information “could be mistaken” for a statement of the Fed’s longer-run objectives, and some said the central bank’s Summary of Economic Projections, published four times a year, could be used to provide more details.

‘Quite Leery’

Fed Governor Sarah Bloom Raskin said Sept. 27 that she will be “quite leery” of allowing inflation or price expectations to rise in an attempt to lower real interest rates. St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said the same day that faster inflation won’t reduce the housing glut.

U.S. employers added 103,000 jobs last month, more than economists forecast, while the jobless rate held at 9.1 percent, the Labor Department said Oct. 7. Job gains have slowed for two straight quarters.

Bernanke said at a Joint Economic Committee hearing Oct. 4 that the two-year-old recovery is “close to faltering.” The U.S. economy expanded at a 1.3 percent annual pace in the second quarter, up from 0.4 percent in the first quarter.

Fed staff economists reduced their forecast for growth in the second half of 2011 “and in the medium term,” the minutes said, without giving specific figures. That was the staff’s fifth consecutive downward revision to the near-term outlook, and the third consecutive revision to the medium-term forecast. Fed governors and regional presidents last gave economic projections in June and will publish revisions Nov. 2.

Relapse Into Recession

Sixty percent of respondents to last month’s Bloomberg Global Poll see the U.S. economy deteriorating, and 50 percent said it will relapse into recession in the next year. Seventy- eight percent of respondents said the Fed’s Operation Twist won’t produce job growth.

Many policy makers at the meeting judged that inflation risks were “roughly balanced,” and officials “generally judged that there was relatively little risk of deflation,” the minutes said. The Fed’s preferred price index, which excludes food and fuel costs, rose 1.6 percent in August from a year earlier, up from 1 percent in March.

To contact the reporter on this story: Scott Lanman in Washington at slanman@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christopher Wellisz at cwellisz@bloomberg.net



Read more...

Buffett Refuses Congressional Republican’s Offer for Swap of Tax Returns

By Andrew Frye - Oct 13, 2011 2:16 AM GMT+0700
Enlarge image Buffett Refuses Freshman Republican’s Offer for Tax-Return

Warren Buffett, chairman and chief executive officer of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., center, waves as he tours floor of the New York Stock Exchange with Cathy Baron Tamraz, chief executive officer of Business Wire, secnod from right, on Sept. 30, 2011. Photographer: Scott Eells/Bloomberg


Warren Buffett, who is pushing for higher taxes on the wealthy, refused the request of a Republican congressman to swap tax returns and reiterated his pledge to publish the form if other billionaires would do the same.

“If you could get other ultra-rich Americans to publish their returns along with mine, that would be very useful to the tax dialogue and intelligent reform,” Buffett said in a letter yesterday to Rep. Tim Huelskamp of Kansas. “I stand ready and willing -- indeed eager -- to participate,” he said in the letter, which was e-mailed to Bloomberg today by an assistant.

Buffett, 81, has drawn criticism from Republicans since teaming with President Barack Obama this year to push tax increases. The chairman of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. has said his tax rate is the lowest of the people who work in his office. Huelskamp, who offered his return in exchange for Buffett’s in an Oct. 5 letter, wouldn’t advance the tax-policy discussion by releasing his form, the billionaire said.

“Unfortunately, publishing your tax return or that of other members of Congress would cast no new light on my claim that the ultra-rich in many cases are paying less in total taxes -- income and payroll taxes paid by them or on their behalf -- to the federal government than many of the middle class,” Buffett said in the letter. “Thanks for your letter. I’m glad you are looking into tax inequities.”

Huelskamp’s letter was forwarded to Bloomberg by Buffett’s assistant, Debbie Bosanek. CNNMoney reported on the letters earlier.

Buffett said in the letter he had adjusted gross income of $62.9 million last year. He told Charlie Rose in an Aug. 16 interview that the figure was “about $62 million.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Andrew Frye in New York at afrye@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Dan Kraut at dkraut2@bloomberg.net



Read more...