Economic Calendar

Thursday, October 6, 2011

Hermes Fund Sees Biggest Raw-Material Rebound in Gold, Grains: Commodities

By Chanyaporn Chanjaroen and Tony Dreibus - Oct 6, 2011 8:38 AM GMT+0700

Corn, wheat and gold will beat other raw materials this quarter as crop yields drop and Europe’s debt crisis stokes demand for bullion, said David Hemming, who helps oversee a fund that returned 20 times the average this year.

Corn may rally 19 percent to $7.25 a bushel, wheat may climb 19 percent to $7.50 a bushel and gold may gain 13 percent to $1,850 an ounce by December, said the London-based fund manager for Hermes Investment Management Ltd. He advises on allocations in the $130 million DB Platinum V Hermes Absolute Return Commodity Fund, a mutual fund which made 12 percent in the first eight months. That compares with a mean return of 0.6 percent across commodity hedge funds tracked by HedgeFund.net.

Commodities entered a bear market last month after tumbling more than 20 percent from this year’s peak in April, on concern that slowing growth will curb demand. While consumption of everything from copper to oil and silver fell in 2008 during the worst slump since World War II, demand for gold and corn grew.

“The biggest potential is the grains,” said Hemming, 30. Gold is “a good hedge against any run in the European sovereign debt and banks, and any macro-driven routs in the U.S.”

The Standard & Poor’s GSCI gauge of 24 commodities fell 6.3 percent this year with sugar, wheat, natural gas and oil among the decliners. Gold was the one of the best performers, along with hogs and cattle, while corn ranked 10th.

Equities, Bonds

The MSCI All-Country World Index of global equities lost 16 percent this year, while Treasuries maturing in 10 years or more returned 29 percent, according to indexes compiled by Bloomberg and the European Federation of Financial Analysts Societies. European policy makers are working to halt a debt crisis and avoid a default among euro members that may be led by Greece.

Investors withdrew $1.08 billion from commodity funds in the week to Sept. 28, the most in more than a month, according to data from EPFR Global, a Cambridge, Massachusetts-based research company. Money managers cut combined net-long positions, or bets on higher prices, across 18 U.S. commodity futures and options by 26 percent in the week to Sept. 27 to the lowest since July 2010, Commodity Futures Trading Commission data show.

Corn fell 23 percent to $5.925 on the Chicago Board of Trade last month, the biggest drop in at least five decades. Futures tumbled on speculation that prices which reached a three-year high in June would crimp exports, spur livestock farmers to switch to other feeds and curb demand from refiners who use the grain to make ethanol. The U.S. Department of Agriculture forecast Sept. 12 that global stockpiles will shrink for a third year, driving inventories to a five-year low.

Yield Forecast

“While the recent selloff has tempered our price expectations, it has also done nothing to ration demand,” said Hemming, who helps manage about $1.7 billion in five commodity funds for Hermes. The next USDA estimates, scheduled to be released on Oct. 12, will probably show more cuts in yield and acreage forecasts, he said.

The return of La Nina, a period of cooling equatorial waters in the Pacific Ocean, may mean dry weather in parts of the U.S. and South America and lower yields, Hemming said. Argentine farmers began planting corn in September and sowing starts this month in Brazil. Weather patterns are within “weak La Nina-like territory,” Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology said in a report Sept. 27.

Most Bullish

Corn is trading at a 3.3 percent discount to wheat, which can also be used as a livestock feed, compared with a premium of more than 5 percent in June, data compiled by Bloomberg show. That’s still above the average discount of 27 percent over the past five years. Wheat declined 32 percent since reaching a 2 1/2-year high of $9.1675 a bushel in February. Speculators are their most bearish on the grain since June 2010, holding a net- short position of 36,215 contracts, CFTC data show.

Wheat futures may climb if money managers close out short positions, said Hemming. Wheat fell 23 percent last month, the biggest drop since 1974. Combined inventories of corn, wheat and barley will decline for a second consecutive year by the end of this season, reaching the lowest since 2008, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data compiled by Bloomberg.

Hermes’s absolute return fund makes bets on the direction of prices and also changes in the relative value of different commodities or settlement dates, said Hemming, who worked at State Street Global Advisors Inc. before joining Hermes in 2006.

Absolute Return

Hemming also helps manage the $85 million DB Platinum V Hermes Enhanced Beta Commodity Fund, which returned 8.2 percent in the first eight months. The fund, together with the absolute return fund, is part of a venture with Frankfurt-based Deutsche Bank AG, Germany’s biggest bank. Hemming additionally helps manage $1.5 billion through Hermes Commodities Index Strategy, Hermes Commodities Index Plus Strategy and Hermes Commodities Alpha Strategy.

The Absolute Return Commodity Fund and the Enhanced Beta Commodity Fund comply with UCITS III, or Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities, which means retail investors in Europe can place money with them.

Gold dropped 15 percent since reaching a record $1,921.15 on Sept. 6 as investors sold the metal to cover losses in other markets. Holdings in exchange-traded products backed by bullion fell 3.7 percent since reaching an all-time high of 2,299.8 metric tons in August, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Hemming’s forecast for prices echoes bets in options on futures traded on the Comex exchange in New York, where the most widely held contract gives the holder the right to buy gold at $2,000 by November. Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which is advising clients to buy December futures, predicts $1,860 in 12 months, according to an Oct. 4 report.

Silver, Platinum

The metal’s 15 percent advance this year compares with a 1.8 percent drop for silver, the precious metal most used in industry. Platinum, used in autocatalysts and jewelry, retreated 15 percent and is on track for its worst year since 2008.

The International Monetary Fund said last month that European lenders face as much as 300 billion euros ($400 billion) of credit risks because of the debt crisis. Banks were the second-worst performing group in the Stoxx Europe 600 Index this year, behind basic-resources companies, losing 34 percent.

“We look to be long gold because of our concerns surrounding Europe, because the problems don’t look to have been solved in a meaningful way,” Hemming said.

To contact the reporters on this story: Chanyaporn Chanjaroen in Singapore at cchanjaroen@bloomberg.net; Tony C. Dreibus in London at tdreibus@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: James Poole at jpoole4@bloomberg.net; Claudia Carpenter at ccarpenter2@bloomberg.net





Read more...

Reid Proposes 5% Tax on Earners of $1M-plus

By Brian Faler - Oct 6, 2011 2:58 AM GMT+0700

Senate Democratic leaders announced a proposal to finance President Barack Obama’s jobs plan with a new surtax on people earning at least $1 million a year as lawmakers press for a showdown over how to boost the economy.

Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said today the 5 percent tax would generate $450 billion, enough to cover the cost of the administration’s proposal. Democrats dared Republicans, who reject tax increases, to block the plan.

“The addition of this proposal makes it very tough for Republicans to oppose the president’s jobs package,” said Senator Charles Schumer of New York, the chamber’s third-ranking Democrat. “Republicans will be hard-pressed to explain why they’d allow teachers and firefighters to be laid off rather than have millionaires and billionaires pay their fair share.”

Democrats said they want to take up the measure next week after completing work on a measure targeting China’s currency policies. Democrats, who control the chamber with 53 of 100 votes, will need the support of at least seven Republicans to bring the matter before the chamber.

‘Political Edge’

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said Democrats were rewriting the bill “not to make it more effective at growing jobs, not to grow bipartisan support.” Rather, he said, “They want to overhaul the bill to sharpen its political edge.”

A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, rejected the surtax idea.

“Republicans have identified areas of common ground where we can work with the president,” said spokesman Michael Steel. “That should be the focus, not desperate tax hike gimmicks floated to cover up divisions within the Democratic caucus.”

Asked why Democrats chose to finance what they call must- pass legislation with a tax increase similar to those previously opposed by Republican lawmakers, Reid pointed to polls he said show Republican voters back higher taxes on the wealthy.

“They’re going to have to listen to their constituents,” Reid told reporters.

Obama unveiled his $447 billion jobs plan Sept. 8 in an address to a joint meeting of Congress. It would extend and expand a payroll tax cut that expires at the end of this year, increase infrastructure spending, offer more aid to cash- strapped state governments and extend jobless benefits.

‘What’s the Problem?’

Since then, Obama has gone on the road, urging and sometimes mocking Republican leaders for not taking up the measure. “What’s the problem?” Obama said yesterday at a community college in the Dallas suburb of Mesquite. “Do they not have the time? They just had a week off. Is it inconvenient?”

Senate Democrats also haven’t been in a hurry to bring the plan before the chamber. They opted to first take up the China currency measure as they worked to resolve differences over the jobs plan within their own caucus.

Democrats such as Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who face tough re-election fights next year, have expressed reservations about Obama’s plan. Reid said he would allow colleagues unhappy with the proposal to offer floor amendments.

How to Pay

Among the most divisive issues is how to pay for the measure, which Obama has said shouldn’t add to the deficit. The proposed millionaires’ tax would replace the administration’s plan to limit tax deductions for those earning at least $250,000, cut tax breaks for the oil and gas industry, and raise taxes on corporate jets.

The Senate Democrats’ surcharge would apply to all income over $1 million regardless of whether it came from capital gains or from salaries. The top marginal tax rate is currently 35 percent while capital gains are subject to a 15 percent levy.

“We believe the million dollars is the right line,” Schumer said, because there are people who make $250,000 or $300,000 “in many of our states who are not rich.” He said setting the threshold at $1 million would also avoid imposing a tax increase on many small businesses.

Schumer last year unsuccessfully pushed for an amendment that would have allowed tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 to expire for millionaires.

“We have spent the last several weeks planning how it can win the most votes on the Senate floor,” and “we believe we have found the best answer available,” said Schumer. “The president from the beginning said he welcomes alternative ways of paying for it -- we think we have found the best way.”

-- With assistance from Laura Litvan in Washington. Editors: Laurie Asseo, Don Frederick

To contact the reporters on this story: Brian Faler in Washington at bfaler@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Silva at msilva34@bloomberg.net





Read more...

Fed Urges Banks Including Goldman Sachs to Control Their Compensation Risk

By James Sterngold and Scott Lanman - Oct 5, 2011 11:48 PM GMT+0700

The Federal Reserve urged Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS), Deutsche Bank AG, Citigroup Inc. (C) and 22 other large banks to take additional measures to control employee-pay practices that can put an entire company at risk.

All the banks have made progress based on guidance from regulators, the Fed said today in Washington in a report based on appraisals that began in late 2009. “Yet every firm also needs to do more” in reforming compensation practices that “were a contributing factor to the financial crisis,” policy makers said.

The report didn’t single out any individual company. Most of the banks should do more to account for the “full range of risks” in employee pay, and some are still trying to identify mid- and lower-level workers whose compensation arrangements could generate excessive risks, the Fed said.

A June 2010 statement from the Fed and other U.S. agencies said many big banks were “deficient” in curbing excessive risk-taking that helped fuel the financial panic that began in 2007. The central bank didn’t repeat that word in today’s report.

UBS AG, Switzerland’s biggest bank, last month discovered a $2.3 billion loss from unauthorized trading and New York-based Goldman Sachs agreed in July 2010 to pay $550 million in a settlement after the Securities and Exchange Commission claimed the bank misled investors about the way its investment bankers put together a subprime mortgage security.

Vesting Policies

“Banking organizations in the horizontal review have made progress in improving deferral practices, but many still have work to do on performance conditions for vesting,” the Fed said in the report.

The firms in the Fed review also included Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America Corp. (BAC), New York’s JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) and Morgan Stanley (MS), as well as the U.S. operations of Barclays Plc, HSBC Holdings Plc and UBS.

The report focused on several methods to control excessive compensation and to “promote safety and soundness,” including deferring pay for executives so that eventual cash payouts are based on longer term results, and reducing pay of company officials if they produce profits by creating large risks for their firms.

More than 60 percent of the incentive pay of senior executives at the 25 banks reviewed was deferred on average, and some had more than 80 percent deferred, the Fed said.

‘Imprudent Risks’

Prior to the credit crisis, firms that deferred some pay typically didn’t cut the awards if there were ultimately bad outcomes, according to the report. “Some employees were provided incentives to take imprudent risks,” the Fed said. Now, the deferred pay, typically for three to five years, can be reduced later if there are poor results.

Most of the firms also have claw-back provisions on pay if officials engage in malfeasance or if financial results must be restated, according to the report.

The Fed also noted that, in a change from past practices, risk-management employees are involved in designing compensation arrangements.

“Yet every firm needs to do more,” the Fed said. “As oversight of incentive compensation moves into the regular supervisory process, the Federal Reserve will continue to work to ensure progress continues.”

To contact the reporters on this story: James Sterngold in New York at jsterngold2@bloomberg.net; Scott Lanman in Washington at slanman@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Christopher Wellisz at cwellisz@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Air France Flight 447 Crash Probe Shows Confused Crew, Misread Instruments

By Laurence Frost - Oct 6, 2011 6:01 AM GMT+0700
Enlarge image Air France Criminal Crash Probe

Salvage teams work to retrieve debris from the wreckage of Air France flight 447 off the coast of Brazil on June 8, 2009. Source: Forca Aerea Brasileira via Bloomberg

Journalists report the first wreckage pieces and objects of the Air France flight AF447, lost in midflight over the Atlantic ocean June 1st 2009. Photographer: Mauricio Lima/AFP/Getty Images


Air France Flight 447’s crew reacted badly to an autopilot shutdown and misread instruments including a gauge indicating how fast the plane was losing height as it plunged into the Atlantic, killing 228 people, a report shows.

“I’ve lost VSI,” the junior co-pilot said of the Airbus’s vertical-speed indicator, according to a recording detailed in the report from court-appointed experts. In fact, the instrument was functioning normally, its analog needle immobilized at the lower limit because the plane was hurtling toward the ocean at 15,000 feet a minute, the document seen by Bloomberg News shows.

Flight 447 from Rio de Janeiro to Paris crashed on June 1, 2009, after ice-blocked speed sensors shut down the autopilot and the crew incorrectly reacted by pulling the jet into a steep climb until it slowed to an aerodynamic stall, France’s BEA accident investigation bureau said in May. The interim report from the criminal probe broadly endorses those findings.

“The aircraft’s stall went completely unnoticed by the crew, who made no reference to it,” according to the report, which was presented to victims’ families yesterday. Faced with unusual readings, the two co-pilots, alone at the controls while the captain was on a rest break, “rejected them en masse.”

Interface Issue

The document identifies no fault with the Airbus SAS A330, beyond the failure of Thales SA (HO) airspeed sensors that caused the autopilot shutdown. Manslaughter charges have been filed against Paris-based Air France and Toulouse, France-based Airbus as part of the criminal investigation, which could increase damages payouts if any criminal liability is established.

“This is an interim report and it’s impossible to draw any conclusions at this stage,” Air France lawyer Fernand Garnault said by telephone yesterday. “The real focus of this investigation is the man-machine interface, and why the pilots didn’t have everything they needed to understand what was happening.”

Air France had earlier suggested the stall alarm confused the A330’s pilots by shutting down when the jet slowed to a point where its computer was receiving no useful information, before sounding again when the speed picked up, misrepresenting what was actually a positive development. In reality, the junior copilot began pulling the nose up again before the alarm resumed, the criminal report suggests.

While referring to the aircraft’s artificial horizon as they struggled to keep its wings level, the co-pilots also disregarded indications from the same instrument that the plane was at a dangerous nose-up angle, the document says.

To contact the reporters on this story: Laurence Frost in Paris at lfrost4@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Chad Thomas at cthomas16@bloomberg.net; Benedikt Kammel at bkammel@bloomberg.net



Read more...

AT&T May Be ‘Big Winner’ With New IPhone in Battle With Verizon Wireless

By Scott Moritz and Sarah Frier - Oct 6, 2011 3:18 AM GMT+0700
Enlarge image AT&T May Be ‘Big Winner’ With New IPhone

An advertisement for the Apple iPhone is displayed in the window of an AT&T Wireless store in San Francisco. Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Oct. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Francisco Jeronimo, research manager at IDC in London, discusses Apple Inc.'s new iPhone 4S and its potential impact on the smartphone market. He speaks with Francine Lacqua on Bloomberg Television's "The Pulse." (Source: Bloomberg)

Oct. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Gene Munster, an analyst at Piper Jaffray Cos., talks about the Apple Inc.'s new iPhone and the outlook for the smartphone market. Munster, speaking with Erik Schatzker and Jon Erlichman on Bloomberg Television's "InsideTrack," also discusses Apple's share performance and possible television development plans. (Source: Bloomberg)


AT&T Inc. (T), the second-largest U.S. wireless operator, may gain an edge against its rivals with Apple Inc. (AAPL)’s latest iPhone announcements.

AT&T uses network technology designed to handle data traffic for iPhone 4S, the model unveiled yesterday, at as much as twice the speed of Verizon Wireless and Sprint Nextel Corp. (S), according to Apple. AT&T will also have an exclusive on the cheaper iPhone 3GS, which the company will give away with a two- year service contract.

The result may be that AT&T will have an advantage in drawing new customers against Verizon Wireless, the country’s largest carrier, and Sprint, which will be offering the Apple device for the first time this fall, said James Dailey, chief investment officer at Team Financial Asset Management LLC.

“There could be a competitive advantage,” Dailey, who is based in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and holds AT&T shares, said in an interview. “That could shift some momentum back to AT&T from Verizon.”

The AT&T iPhone 4S uses a faster version of technology called high-speed packet access, or HSPA, that increases speeds to as much as 14.4 megabits per second. The Verizon and Sprint iPhones use a technology called CDMA, or code division multiple access, for which there’s no comparable speed jump.

“The big winner on this phone is AT&T,” said Roger Entner, a wireless strategist with Boston-based Recon Analytics.

Beyond Product Specs

For Verizon, which outpaced AT&T in subscriber growth in the second quarter, the relative speeds of the Apple iPhone may make it more challenging to draw new customers in the fourth quarter, said Todd Rethemeier, an analyst with Hudson Square Research in New York.

“Verizon is going to be marketing the exact same phone that AT&T and Sprint have, except it will be 3G with a limited data plan,” Rethemeier said in a note today. “We think this puts Verizon at a significant marketing disadvantage.”

Verizon Wireless said customers will chose a carrier because of factors that go beyond product specifications.

“While iPhone 4S may look like the same device across all carriers, customers know they are choosing reliability when they select a Verizon Wireless iPhone 4S,” said Marni Walden, the company’s chief marketing officer.

AT&T, based in Dallas, rose 43 cents to $28.31 at 4 p.m. on the New York Stock Exchange. The stock has dropped 3.6 percent this year. Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ), based in New York, dropped 13 cents to $35.77, while Sprint, based in Overland Park, Kansas, closed unchanged at $2.86.

To contact the reporter on this story: Scott Moritz in New York at smoritz6@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Peter Elstrom at pelstrom@bloomberg.net



Read more...

Tim Cook Aims to Carry On for ‘Creative Genius’

By Adam Satariano and Peter Burrows - Oct 6, 2011 8:49 AM GMT+0700
Enlarge image Apple Inc. Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook

Tim Cook, chief executive officer of Apple Inc. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg

Oct. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Steve Jobs, who built the world’s most valuable technology company by creating devices that changed how people use electronics and revolutionized the computer, music and mobile-phone industries, died. He was 56. Bloomberg's Erik Schatzker reports on the life of Apple Inc.'s co-founder and former chief executive officer. (Source: Bloomberg)


Apple Inc. (AAPL) Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook faces the challenge of crafting the company’s strategy following the death of Steve Jobs, a man he called “a visionary and creative genius.”

Cook, who became CEO on Aug. 24 after Jobs switched to the role of chairman, announced his predecessor’s death today in a message to employees.

“Apple has lost a visionary and creative genius, and the world has lost an amazing human being,” Cook, 50, said in the memo. “Those of us who have been fortunate enough to know and work with Steve have lost a dear friend and an inspiring mentor. Steve leaves behind a company that only he could have built, and his spirit will forever be the foundation of Apple.”

The announcement came one day after Cook took the stage to introduce a new iPhone, marking his first product unveiling since taking the reins. To maintain Apple’s growth, he’ll have to push into more new markets, continue the company’s Asian expansion and execute a shift to cloud computing.

Jobs hired Cook from Compaq Computer Corp. in 1998, and the deputy soon proved his mettle as an operations expert. Cook transformed inventory management to enable Apple to ship the iconic iMac in a rainbow of colors, deviating from the typical plain beige box. He later was able to orchestrate the speedy delivery of iPods, iPads and iPhones -- often within 48 hours -- to help forge an army of Apple loyalists.

‘Not Going to Change’

Cook must now take up the mantle of charting Apple’s creative vision, something he was less involved with in his previous job as chief operations officer.

Following Jobs’s retirement as CEO, Cook said to employees that “Apple is not going to change” and he reiterated that thought today: “We will honor his memory by dedicating ourselves to continuing the work he loved so much.”

Cook led the company when Jobs was out during three medical leaves. Though he’s a counterpoint to Jobs’s more emotional personality, the men are two sides of the same coin, said Mike Janes, who used to run Apple’s online store. Both are demanding leaders with an attention to detail.

“Despite their style differences, their intensity is basically equal,” Janes, now the CEO of tickets search engine FanSnap.com, said in an interview earlier this year. “They are both perfectionists.”

Different Approach

Jobs’s absence was palpable throughout the 90-minute introduction of the iPhone 4S yesterday at Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino, California.

“This is my first product launch since being named CEO,” Cook said, the only Jobs reference, if veiled, at the entire event. “I’m sure you didn’t know that.”

Jobs was renowned for stirring, meticulously rehearsed pitches. Cook delivered his remarks more slowly and methodically, and he let other executives do much of the presentation.

“There’s no way to replace Steve Jobs -- and there were times during the performance that you felt that,” said Gene Munster, an analyst at Piper Jaffray Cos.

Still, Cook is the right man to carry on the vision, Munster said.

“Jobs’s final act as CEO was another of his many great accomplishments,” Munster said today in a report. He reiterated his endorsement of Apple’s stock. “Cook is capable of running Apple, but his rare combination of extreme humility and insatiable motivation make him uniquely suited to continue Jobs’s work as CEO and carry on his vision with a peerless executive team.”

Long Hours

Cook is typically found working long hours at the company’s headquarters or traveling around the world to meet with suppliers and manufacturers, Janes said. Cook led the company’s negotiations with Verizon Wireless to bring the iPhone to that carrier in the U.S. this year.

During his 13 years at Apple, Cook has mastered an expanding list of operational roles, including manufacturing, distribution, sales and customer service.

“We have great confidence in Tim Cook, who is a partner of high quality,” Stephane Richard, CEO of France Telecom SA, said in an interview the day Jobs stepped down. Richard’s company provides carrier service for the iPhone.

Google Threat

While Cook was Jobs’s choice for successor, he hasn’t had much time to demonstrate whether he can rally the company’s roughly 50,000 employees as effectively as Jobs, who steered Apple into industries as varied as mobile phones, music downloads and retailing.

Cook also faces mounting competition, in part because of Apple’s foray into new markets. Google Inc. (GOOG)’s Android has emerged as the biggest smartphone operating system, bolstered by HTC Corp. (2498), Samsung Electronics Co. and Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc. adopting the software. Google said Aug. 15 it planned to purchase Motorola Mobility for $12.5 billion.

Investors, meanwhile, may be more likely to pressure Cook to use some of Apple’s cash -- now more than $75 billion, including long-term holdings -- for a dividend or stock buyback.

“He’s a very competent corporate manager,” said Apple investor Peter Sorrentino, a senior portfolio manager at Huntington Asset Advisors in Cincinnati, which oversees $14.8 billion in assets. “People are going to be looking for that crack of weakness, and they’ll be looking at him a lot closer than they look at Steve.”

ICloud Service

In addition to overhauling the company’s supply chain, Cook also has led the company into new markets. Sales in China reached $3.8 billion in the last reported quarter, up sixfold from a year ago. The company is looking to fuel more growth with its new iCloud service, which stores files online.

To maintain its streak of innovations, Cook will have to lean on a corps of executives. Jonathan Ive oversees a staff of product designers that is considered among the best in the world. Scott Forstall leads development of Apple’s mobile software. Bob Mansfield runs hardware engineering, and Peter Oppenheimer is chief financial officer. The executive team, which often meets on Monday mornings to receive sales updates and discuss strategy, has been together for years.

“The team here has an unparalleled breadth and depth of talent and a culture of innovation that Steve has driven in the company,” Cook said in January. “Excellence has become a habit.”

Companies such as Nike Inc. and International Business Machines Corp. have thrived without their iconic leaders, said John Connors, a venture capitalist at Ignition Partners and former finance chief at Microsoft Corp. He and Cook sit on Nike’s board, which oversaw the retirement of CEO Phil Knight.

“The good Lord created one Steve Jobs, but he only created one Phil Knight and Nike is still an enormous success,” Connors said. “I am sure the world will see in the next several years that Tim is a very uniquely gifted guy and Apple will be wildly successful under his leadership.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Adam Satariano in San Francisco at asatariano1@bloomberg.net; Peter Burrows in San Francisco at pburrows@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net



Read more...

APPLE’S STEVE JOBS DIES AT 56

By Jim Aley - Oct 6, 2011 8:45 AM GMT+0700
Enlarge image Steve Jobs

Steve Jobs delivers a keynote address at the 2005 Macworld Expo in San Francisco. Photographer: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Oct. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Steve Jobs, who built the world’s most valuable technology company by creating devices that changed how people use electronics and revolutionized the computer, music and mobile-phone industries, died. He was 56. Bloomberg's Erik Schatzker reports on the life of Apple Inc.'s co-founder and former chief executive officer. (Source: Bloomberg)


Steve Jobs, who built the world’s most valuable technology company by creating devices that changed how people use electronics and revolutionized the computer, music and mobile-phone industries, died. He was 56.

Jobs, who resigned as Apple Inc. chief executive officer on Aug. 24, 2011, passed away today, the Cupertino, California- based company said. He was diagnosed in 2003 with a neuroendocrine tumor, a rare form of pancreatic cancer, and had a liver transplant in 2009.

“We are deeply saddened to announce that Steve Jobs passed away today,” Apple said. “Steve’s brilliance, passion and energy were the source of countless innovations that enrich and improve all of our lives. The world is immeasurably better because of Steve.”

Jobs embodied the Silicon Valley entrepreneur. He was a long-haired counterculture technophile who dropped out of college and started a computer company in his parents’ garage on April Fools’ Day, 1976. He had no formal technical training and no real business experience.

What he had instead was an appreciation of technology’s elegance and a notion that computers could be more than a hobbyist’s toy or a corporation’s workhorse. These machines could be indispensable tools. A computer could be, he often said, “a bicycle for our minds.” He was right -- owing largely to a revolution he started.

Obama Statement

Jobs’s passing was met with an outpouring of grief from consumers who flocked to Apple stores, technology executives who partnered and competed with Jobs over the years and even President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama.

“Michelle and I are saddened to learn of the passing of Steve Jobs,” Obama said. “Steve was among the greatest of American innovators -- brave enough to think differently, bold enough to believe he could change the world, and talented enough to do it.”

On his watch, Apple came to dominate the digital age, first through the creation of the Macintosh computer and later through the iPod digital music player, the iPhone wireless handset and more recently, the iPad tablet.

With each product, Jobs confronted new adversaries -- from International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) in computers to Microsoft Corp. in operating systems, to Sony Corp. (6758) in music players and Google Inc. in mobile software.

Visionary to Virtuoso

And Jobs would prove himself not just a techie visionary, but the virtuoso executive who built the world’s second-most valuable company after Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM)

The opening act of Jobs’s professional ascent stretched from 1976 to 1984. He scored his first hit with the Apple II computer, a device that resonated with schools and some consumers and small businesses, and made Apple an alluring alternative to IBM, then the world’s largest computer maker. Apple had its initial public offering in 1980 and the graphical Macintosh was born just over three years later.

During his second act, from 1984 to 1997, Jobs’s star dimmed. In 1985, he was fired after a power struggle with Apple’s board. He started another computer company, NeXT Computer Inc., and bought a digital animation studio from filmmaker George Lucas. The firm later took the name Pixar.

String of Hits

Apple’s purchase of NeXT in 1997 brought Jobs back to the computer maker he helped found and commenced his career’s third act. The company was foundering. He ignited a flurry of innovation and growth -- and achieved what may be the greatest comeback in business history.

Whether he was working on the Mac or the iPhone or backing the computer animation that yielded an unbroken string of Pixar hits, Jobs proved that complex technologies could be designed into simple, beautiful products that people would find irresistible.

His meticulous attention to product detail carried over to his public image, which grew inseparable from the Apple brand. In public he wore beltless jeans and a black mock-turtleneck.

On the few occasions he granted interviews -- appearing on the covers of Time, Fortune or BusinessWeek, for instance -- he fretted over such minutiae as which photographer would take his picture. The reclusiveness only added to his mystique.

“The mystery is actually wonderful,” said Regis McKenna, a computer-industry marketing consultant who first worked with Apple in the 1980s. “You want to know more about this company the more mysterious it is.”

Product Unveilings

Another way Jobs manufactured his aura was with product unveilings. He obsessively prepared for the choreographed occasions, often at Apple’s Cupertino campus or San Francisco’s Moscone Center, rehearsing his delivery many times over. He would scrap presentations wholesale, even at the last minute, if they weren’t up to snuff.

He captivated audiences, and the gadgets he introduced resonated with consumers the world over, adding billions of dollars in revenue. Sales surged 82 percent to a record $28.6 billion in the June 2011 period, the last full quarter before Jobs resigned, and the stock closed at $376.18 on Aug. 24, before the move was announced. That gave Apple a market value of $348.8 billion.

All that success came with an ego to match. Jobs was a notorious control-freak with authority issues, associates and former employees say. He came close to breaking securities laws by backdating employee stock options. Even his worsening health -- or his non-disclosure of his illness to shareholders -- drew scrutiny from authorities.

‘Park Different’

In Apple’s parking lot, people often noticed Jobs’ silver Mercedes-Benz SL 55 AMG parked in the handicapped spaces. His cars were easy to spot because he refused to put license plates on them. “It’s a little game I play,” he told Fortune in 2001. Employees stuck notes under the car’s windshield wipers, encouraging Jobs to “Park Different,” a play on the “Think Different” Apple advertising slogan.

Jobs was known to praise people one minute and belittle them the next. According to “The Second Coming of Steve Jobs” by Alan Deutschman, this management style was known at Apple as the “hero-shithead roller coaster.” No one was immune from Jobs’s tirades, and he had strained relationships with colleagues, friends, and family throughout his life.

“Steve Jobs is a bit like a campfire,” Neil Sims, a headhunter who helped recruit executives for Jobs, said in an interview in October 2008. “Everyone wants to be close enough to stay warm. No one wants to get close enough to get burned.”

Growing Up

Steven Paul Jobs was born Feb. 24, 1955, in San Francisco, to unwed college graduate students Joanne Carole Schieble and Syrian emigrant Abdulfattah “John” Jandali. He was adopted by Clara and Paul Jobs, who raised Steve in the middle-class enclaves of Mountain View and Los Altos in California.

“That was right in the heart of Silicon Valley, so there were engineers all around,” Jobs said in a 1995 interview conducted by the Smithsonian Institution. “It was really the most wonderful place in the world to grow up.”

Jobs took advantage of the local technological ferment. His father had a workshop in the garage, and created a space for his son to tinker. A neighbor, who was a ham radio operator and Hewlett-Packard employee, taught him about electronics. Young Steve loved figuring out how things worked.

“It gave a tremendous level of self-confidence,” Jobs said in the Smithsonian interview. “Through exploration and learning one could understand seemingly very complex things.”

Self-Confidence

That self-confidence was on full display before he hit high school. As Jobs once told BusinessWeek, at age 12 he called William Hewlett, the co-founder of Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ), about some parts for a frequency counter he was trying to build. Hewlett stayed on the phone 20 minutes; Jobs got the parts he needed -- and eventually, a summer gig at Hewlett-Packard.

Catherine Lawler Jacobs, who lived around the block from the Jobs family, said she remembers Steve as a teen. Jobs appeared in her driveway one day, asking for her help setting up an office in his parents’ house. She’d been earning money selling turquoise jewelry and a neighbor recommended her as someone who knew a little about business. Jobs had no money to pay her but offered her shares in his new company.

“I said, and I remember this exactly, ‘I don’t want any phony shares. I want to get paid,’” Jacobs recalled in an interview. “You see, I wasn’t going to be burned by some nerd who was always hanging out in his garage.”

5-Cent Cans

In 1972 Jobs graduated from Homestead High School in Cupertino, also the alma mater of his future business partner, Steve Wozniak, Class of 1968. He then headed north to attend Reed College, a liberal arts school in Portland, Oregon, famous for its Bohemian atmosphere. He dropped out after six months.

He didn’t leave right away, though. He stuck around campus for another year and a half, sleeping on friends’ floors and living off the money he raised by collecting bottles for 5-cent deposits. He listened in on classes, too, including one that would inspire a lifelong mission of elegant design -- a course on calligraphy.

“It was beautiful, historical, artistically subtle in a way that science can’t capture, and I found it fascinating,” Jobs said in a 2005 commencement address at Stanford University.

As Jobs told those Stanford grads, he “connected the dots” between this developing aesthetic sense and his technical understanding. He realized that technology and artistry could be complementary. More than that, the new world of computers offered a new medium for creativity.

Back in California

By late 1974, Jobs was back in California, immersed in the technology-tinged counterculture of Silicon Valley. He traveled to India, became a Buddhist, experimented with LSD. He also hung out with his friend Wozniak -- they’d met a few years earlier through a fellow electronics enthusiast -- at the Homebrew Computer Club, a group of engineers and hobbyists who would meet to swap parts and ideas.

The two started working together on projects, with Woz the tech genius and Jobs the brash idea man. An early effort was a “blue box” -- a hacker’s term for a device that taps into the phone system to make free long-distance calls. It worked.

“What we learned was that we could build something ourselves that could control billions of dollars worth of infrastructure in the world,” Jobs said in the 1996 PBS documentary “Triumph of the Nerds.” “That was an incredible lesson. I don’t think there would ever have been an Apple computer had there not been blue boxes.”

Apple’s Origins

Wozniak began putting together a contraption he and Jobs could show off to their Homebrew buddies. The Apple I was little more than a motherboard, the main circuit board in a personal computer. Whoever bought one -- Woz and Jobs sold 50 to a local hobby store -- had to supply their own case to hold the circuitry, not to mention a keyboard and monitor. It may have been primitive, but it was the proof of concept they needed. They knew they could build a better computer, and Jobs knew people would buy it.

The pair officially began Apple Computer on April 1, 1976. Twelve months later the company introduced the Apple II. It was a hit and became the first widely used home computer. The company’s sales reached $117 million in fiscal 1980, the year the company went public.

The Apple II was hardly a technological great leap forward. Yet unlike its predecessor, it did come with a keyboard and was housed in a plastic case. Nor was it alone in the marketplace. Commodore and RadioShack Corp. (RSH) also came out with early home- computer models around the same time; the Altair 8800 had been introduced in 1975.

‘Bad Guys’

IBM entered the market in 1981 with its own PC, using software from a tiny startup called Microsoft Corp. rather than building its own operating system. Jobs professed to be unconcerned, even running a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal, saying “Welcome, IBM. Seriously.”

The Mac’s slow start gave IBM and other machines running Microsoft software and Intel Corp. (INTC) chips a chance to win adherents and build an ecosystem.

What set Apple apart was its charismatic frontman, Jobs, who was rapidly turning into a business superstar. He hyped. He dated Joan Baez and Diane Keaton. He saw himself and his company as an anti-establishment force, waging a noble campaign to battle the faceless power of IBM.

“You always need to have bad guys and good guys in America,” said McKenna, the technology marketing expert. “Apple was thumbing its nose at this big world of monolithic standards. It became a rebel. It became a symbol of fast growth, youth.”

Big Brother

Us-versus-IBM was the guiding worldview behind the famous TV commercial that introduced Apple’s next major product, the Macintosh. The 60-second spot, directed by Ridley Scott, ran only once, during the 1984 Super Bowl. It depicted an Orwellian world of grim conformity. A lone woman wearing a tank top sprints through the grayness and throws a hammer through a giant screen, shattering the droning visage of Big Brother.

The Mac, with its mouse and graphics, demonstrated Jobs’s ability to see the potential of new technologies and package them in a way that would appeal to the most demanding aesthete he could imagine: himself.

Jobs had first seen a graphical user interface prototype a few years earlier on a visit to Xerox Corp. (XRX)’s Palo Alto Research Center, and immediately knew it was the future of computing. He had no compunction about copying the idea.

“Ultimately it comes down to taste,” Jobs said in “Triumph of the Nerds.” “It comes down to trying to expose yourself to the best things that humans have done and then trying to bring those things in to what you’re doing. I mean, Picasso had a saying. He said, ‘Good artists copy. Great artists steal.’”

Inscrutable Autocrat

The Mac project showed another side of Jobs: the inscrutable autocrat. He could be charming and rude almost in the same sentence, leaving underlings scared or dazzled or both. People who worked for Jobs called his powers of persuasion the “reality distortion field.” Andy Hertzfeld, an early Apple engineer, described the phenomenon in “Revolution in the Valley,” his 2005 book about the development of the Macintosh computer.

“The reality distortion field was a confounding melange of a charismatic rhetorical style, an indomitable will and an eagerness to bend any fact to fit the purpose at hand,” Hertzfeld wrote. “If one line of argument failed to persuade, he would deftly switch to another.”

Jobs’s Intolerance

Andrea Cunningham, who worked with McKenna on marketing the Mac in the 1980s, said that Jobs’ intolerance of aesthetic infractions never let up. Cunningham was with Jobs in his room at The Carlyle hotel in New York City for a magazine cover shoot. Jobs, who Cunningham said “always had to have the environment exactly right,” began yelling about a particular flower he wanted -- a calla lily.

“He was being such a pill,” said Cunningham, who is now head of marketing of Rearden Commerce in Foster City, California. “Where do you get a calla lily in New York in December at 11 at night? I found a florist. I found the calla lilies. And the next thing was a bowl of strawberries on the piano. And a separate bowl of whipped cream. We spent three or four hours doing this.”

Jobs could bewitch too, as he did when he hired PepsiCo Inc. executive John Sculley to be Apple’s CEO in 1983. Jobs famously asked him, “Do you want to sell sugar water for the rest of your life, or do you want to come with me and change the world?”

Uncontrollable

“He looked up at me and just stared at me with the stare that only Steve Jobs has,” Sculley recalled in “Triumph of the Nerds.” “I just gulped because I knew I would wonder for the rest of my life what I would have missed.”

Not long after the launch of the Mac, Jobs’ relationship with Sculley and Apple’s board soured. Arthur Rock, the Silicon Valley venture capitalist and early Apple board member, said Jobs’s obsessions and unyielding personality got the best of him.

“Back then he was uncontrollable,” Rock said in a 2007 interview with Institutional Investor. “He got ideas in his head, and the hell with what anybody else wanted to do. Being a founder of the company, he went off and did them regardless of whether it ended up being good for the company.”

The Mac didn’t sell well during the 1984 holiday shopping season, and Sculley demanded in April 1985 that Jobs be relieved of day-to-day duties and serve as a non-executive chairman, playing the role of outside spokesman. Jobs hated the idea and tried to get the backing of Apple’s directors. The board sided with Sculley and Jobs was out.

Down, Not Out

Jobs was 30 years old and devastated, but not for long.

“I didn’t see it then,” Jobs said in his 2005 Stanford speech, “but it turned out that getting fired from Apple was the best thing that could have ever happened to me. The heaviness of being successful was replaced by the lightness of being a beginner again.”

In 1985 he founded NeXT, which developed a powerful computer based on the Unix operating system. The sleek, black machines earned a reputation for elegant design and high performance; Tim Berners-Lee created the World Wide Web on a NeXT workstation.

NeXT was hardly a success. The computers were too expensive to gain a wide following. Still, the software developed at NeXT would later provide the technological underpinnings for Apple machines.

Pixar

The following year, Jobs bought George Lucas’s computer- graphics shop for $10 million and renamed it Pixar. The studio’s first feature film, “Toy Story,” was the top-grossing film of 1995, and kicked off an unbroken string of hits. Walt Disney Co. (DIS) bought Pixar in 2006 for $8.06 billion and gave Jobs a seat on the company’s board. He became Disney’s largest shareholder.

In his personal life, Jobs settled down. He married Laurene Powell in 1991 in a Buddhist ceremony at the Ahwahnee Hotel in Yosemite National Park, according to biographer Deutschman. The couple have three children.

He also reconciled with his daughter, Lisa Brennan-Jobs, who was born in 1978 to his then girlfriend Chrisann Brennan. Chrisann raised Lisa mainly on her own. By the time Lisa was a teenager and before she attended Harvard University, she moved into her father’s home.

‘More Glamorous World’

“In California, my mother had raised me mostly alone,” Lisa wrote in an article for Vogue in 2008. “We didn’t have many things, but she is warm and we were happy. We moved a lot. We rented. My father was rich and renowned, and later, as I got to know him, went on vacations with him, and then lived with him for a few years, I saw another, more glamorous world.”

Neither Lisa Brennan-Jobs nor Chrisann Brennan, now a painter in San Francisco, would comment when contacted recently.

Jobs didn’t get in touch with his biological father, John Jandali, a onetime academic who went on to run beverage services at the Boomtown Casino in Reno, Nevada. Jandali and Schieble had another child after putting Steve up for adoption, a daughter named Mona Simpson, now a novelist. Jandali left the mother of his child. Schieble raised the girl alone.

“I’m proud of the fact that he’s my biological son, even though I cannot take credit for anything he’s done,” Jandali said in an interview at the Boomtown Casino in April 2009. He said he had never spoken to Steve.

Ascendance of Gates

Jobs’s absence from Apple coincided with the ascendance of Bill Gates and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), developer of a graphics-driven operating system of its own called Windows. Apple filed, and eventually lost, a lawsuit against Microsoft, arguing that Windows was a Mac knockoff.

When Jobs got wind of Microsoft’s plans for what would become Windows, he screamed at Gates about ripping Apple off, according to a 1983 essay by Andy Hertzfeld, the Mac’s chief software designer.

Gates coolly replied, “It’s more like we both had this rich neighbor named Xerox, and I broke into his house to steal the TV set and found out that you had already stolen it,” wrote Hertzfeld, who witnessed the interchange.

Meanwhile, Apple was dying. By late 1997, it had racked up two years of losses and the Mac’s share of the PC market was in the single digits and falling. On stage at a conference that year, Michael Dell was asked how he would revive Apple if he were CEO.

“What would I do? I’d shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders,” he said. Jobs would later say the company was 90 days from bankruptcy.

Desperate Measures

In desperation, Apple agreed to buy NeXT for $400 million in late 1996, and Jobs accepted a role as adviser to then-CEO Gil Amelio. Within seven months, Amelio was gone and Jobs was once again running the company.

One of the first things Jobs did upon retaking the reins was fire all but two of Apple’s board members. His handpicked replacements were Bill Campbell, a former Apple executive and then-CEO of Intuit; Jerome York, former IBM CFO and onetime adviser to Tracinda Corp. CEO Kirk Kerkorian; and Jobs’ longtime friend, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison. Ellison left the board in 2002; York died in 2010. Campbell is still a director.

Jobs also rebuilt the executive team, installing key technical managers from NeXT who would help him guide Apple’s strategy over the next decade. They included Jon Rubinstein, who had run NeXT’s hardware engineering, and Avie Tevanian, the young software engineer who helped create NeXT’s operating system.

Rubinstein went on to lead Apple’s iPod division before departing for smartphone maker Palm Inc., while Tevanian served as chief software technology officer. Jobs also found talent within Apple, singling out a British-born designer named Jonathan Ive to lead industrial design.

$1 A Year

As a show of Jobs’s not-in-it-for-the-money drive to fix Apple, he insisted on getting paid $1 a year, a salary package that continued for the remainder of his career.

Jobs’s remuneration instead came mainly from stock options, restricted stock and an $84 million Gulfstream V jet, given to him by the board in 2000.

Jobs’s net worth was at least $6.7 billion as of Sept. 6, according to Bloomberg estimates. His 7.4 percent Disney stake was worth $4.4 billion, and his 5.5 million shares of Apple were worth $2.1 billion. Jobs’s 138 million shares of Disney had paid him at least $242 million in dividends before taxes since 2006, according to Bloomberg data.

Stock options let holders buy shares later, usually at the trading price on the day the options were granted. Like other Silicon Valley executives, Jobs viewed the securities as a necessary incentive to keep valuable employees.

Backdating Options

“That’s the key asset Apple has -- is its talent,” Jobs would later say in a March 2008 deposition with the Securities and Exchange Commission. “I was very concerned that Apple could really suffer some big losses on its executive team with the business environment we were in, and the competitors coming after our people.”

And like hundreds of other technology companies, Apple engaged in “backdating,” or retroactively changing grant dates to those with lower stock prices. The practice could artificially boost employee compensation and ran the risk of shielding compensation costs from investors. It came under scrutiny by the SEC.

Jobs admitted in 2006 to recommending some favorable dates on options other than his own. A special committee of Apple’s board exonerated him of any misconduct, and the SEC said in April 2007 that Apple wouldn’t be sanctioned.

“Jobs was one of these CEOs who ran the company like he wanted to -- he believed he knew more about it than anyone else, and he probably did,” Arthur Levitt, a former chairman of the SEC, said in a February 2009 interview.

Jobs Returns

Levitt said that around the time of the two grants that got Apple in trouble, Jobs invited him to join the company’s board - - then disinvited him because his views on corporate governance were “too independent, too doctrinaire” for Jobs.

Levitt also praised Jobs.

“He’s among the best CEOs I’ve ever known, in spite of his irreverence, irascibility and ego,” Levitt said.

When Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, he was still an exacting connoisseur of design. Only now, he demonstrated an understanding that he needed to place his bets carefully. He culled the company’s product line, killing money-losing projects such as the Newton personal digital assistant. He ended the Mac “clone” program that let other computer makers install Apple’s operating system on their machines; he called the welcoming of clones an “ill-conceived” move that undercut Apple’s own Mac hardware sales.

IMac Unveiled

“We’re always thinking about new markets we could enter,” Jobs told BusinessWeek magazine in 2004. “But it’s only by saying no that you can concentrate on the things that are really important.”

“How he looked at things from a product perspective is very rare,” said Ed Zander, a CEO of Motorola Inc. before it split into two companies. “You don’t find many CEOs who have the attention to detail from the product experience point of view -- and understand the business side of the house.”

The first tangible result of Jobs’ return was the iMac, which he introduced at the Flint Center in Cupertino, California, in 1998. The iMac looked like no other computer: It was a bulbous, sci-fi looking number encased in translucent plastic. The unveiling that day had all the usual language of a Jobs keynote -- the iMac was “beautiful,” “cool,” and “a really big deal.”

The iMac would become Apple’s best-selling desktop ever, according to the company. The decision to offer the computer in five colors flew in the face of the then-common industry practice of packaging machines in easy-to-manufacture -- if dull -- beige boxes.

IPod, ITunes

“I remember scratching my head at the time, when Apple first came out with those first little colored desktop Macs, the iMacs,” said Blake Johnson, an assistant professor in engineering at Stanford University. “But the message and splash of five different colors was a conscious decision -- okay, we have some supply chain inefficiencies, but those are more than offset by the positive impact on customers.”

Apple was profitable again by 1998, and over the next decade released a series of blockbusters that went beyond traditional computing. The iPod media player and the iPhone were beautiful objects that ignited consumer lust in Apple’s sparsely elegant -- and typically crowded -- retail stores. Jobs dropped “Computer” from the company name in 2007 at the time he unveiled the iPhone.

Beneath the contours of Ive’s designs were two less obvious achievements. The first was the software that made all those devices work together.

Doing Jobs’s Bidding

All of it was rooted in a single operating system, OS X, which had its beginnings in Tevanian’s work at NeXT. Apple’s great strength, Jobs would say repeatedly, was that it was a software company.

“An iPod is really just software,” Jobs said at the All Things D technology conference in 2007. “It’s in a beautiful box -- but it’s software. If you look at what a Mac is, it’s OS X. It’s in a beautiful box, but it’s OS X. And if you look at what an iPhone will hopefully be, it’s software.”

The other big achievement was Jobs’ ability to create hits by getting industry partners to do his bidding. For the iTunes music store, he not only demanded that the major music labels sell their product over the Internet, but do so at a single price, 99 cents a song. He convinced AT&T Inc. to modify its network to handle the iPhone’s many features in exchange for exclusive rights to sell the iPhone to U.S. buyers. Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ)’s wireless division started selling the iPhone in February 2011.

Cancer Diagnosis

“The AT&Ts and Verizons of the world want to control the software, product, the brand, the colors, where the keyboard goes, the pricing, the distribution,” said Zander, the former Motorola CEO, who partnered with Jobs on an early music-playing phone. “Here comes Steve and he says to AT&T, you get the product but I get the brand, I get the colors, I get the software, I get the distribution pretty much, I get the pricing.”

Apple’s iPhone became the world’s best-selling smartphone in the second quarter of 2011.

Jobs said in 2004 that he had been diagnosed and treated for a neuroendocrine tumor in his pancreas. After surgery to remove an islet cell tumor, he took a month off to recuperate and declared himself healthy and cancer free.

‘Follow Your Heart’

For a few years he looked that way. He was thinner, which was no surprise after what he’d been through. One person who knew him well said that the cancer scare didn’t slow him down, convince him to spend more time with family or reconnect with friends. If anything, Jobs seemed to get even more engaged with work, said this person, who wished to remain anonymous because the matter was private.

During the 2005 Stanford commencement address, Jobs described how the inevitability of death was a motivating force in his life.

“Remembering you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked; there is no reason not to follow your heart,” he said.

Jobs’s appearance changed noticeably by early 2008. He started looking gaunt. Tech blogs bubbled with discussion about what was going on. Typical headlines: “The Incredible Shrinking Apple CEO,” and “Why Does Steve Jobs Look So Thin?

Reports of Death

When he took the stage at Apple events, Jobs joked about his health. In August of that year, Bloomberg News erroneously published an obituary; at a product launch a month later he recited the Mark Twain line that reports of his death were greatly exaggerated. At another event that year, he projected a slide of his blood pressure.

In January 2009, Jobs said that his weight loss was caused by a “hormone imbalance”; nine days later, he began a five- month medical leave, handing control of the company to his COO, Tim Cook. Later that year, he underwent a liver transplant at Methodist University Hospital in Memphis.

Apple’s disclosures -- or lack thereof -- around Jobs’s health became a matter of debate among investors and corporate governance experts. Some said that because his health was critical to the company’s success, Apple should have said more, sooner. The counterargument: privacy laws trump investors’ right to know the details of his health. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission officials examined in 2009 whether the company violated disclosure rules regarding Jobs’s medical status, a person familiar with the matter said at the time. No legal action was taken.

Google Gains

While Jobs was on leave that year, Apple came under competitive pressure from an unexpected source: Google Inc. (GOOG) The search giant, whose then-CEO Eric Schmidt was an Apple board member, had gotten into the smartphone business with its Android operating system.

Unlike the iPhone, Android phones were made by multiple manufacturers. The budding rivalry evoked the Mac vs. PC showdowns of the 1980s. It pitted a company -- Apple -- that made one kind of device against an array of manufacturers orbiting around a software operating system -- in this case, Google’s Android.

By the time Jobs returned to work in June, several Android devices were on the market. Google’s Schmidt resigned from Apple’s board in August, acknowledging the escalating tension between the two companies.

Jobs the following year introduced his next epoch-making product: the iPad. The run-up was full of the buzz that greeted past products. What would it look like? What would it do? Only a select handful of developers and media companies got access to pre-release versions of the iPad, and then only under strict conditions. Recipients had to agree to keep the devices tethered to a fixed object in rooms that blacked-out windows.

‘Antennagate’

At the product unveiling, Jobs said that the tablet computer would go on sale later that year, calling it “magical.” The public agreed: Apple sold more than 300,000 iPads on day one, and within a few months the device had a near monopoly share of the tablet market that companies led by Microsoft had failed to crack for a decade.

Another momentous product was in store for 2010. The iPhone 4 boasted a glass front and back and a brushed-steel band around the edge. It also came with a front-facing camera that would allow mobile videoconferencing.

While the iPhone 4 was destined for success, this time there was a glitch. Customers who held the phone a certain way experienced dropped phone calls -- the “death grip,” it was called.

‘Antennagate’

At first, Apple denied anything was wrong and suggested that customers were holding the phone incorrectly. The flaw snowballed into a public-relations crisis that came to be known as “Antennagate,” stoked by longtime grumbling over service quality on the network of AT&T, then the only U.S. iPhone carrier.

By July, Jobs had changed his tune. He apologized to customers and offered free “bumpers,” rubber cases that fit around the metal edge of the phone, so that fingertips wouldn’t cause any antenna interference.

The imbroglio had little impact on iPhone demand. Apple sold 1.7 million iPhone 4s during the first three days it was on sale; by the end of the year, the iPhone would represent nearly 40 percent of revenue.

During the introduction of a new MacBook Air in October 2010, Jobs appeared thinner than ever. Three months later, Jobs said he would be taking a new leave of absence to “focus on my health.” “I love Apple so much and hope to be back as soon as I can,” he said.

Cook’s Role

For the third time since 2004, Cook took over day-to-day operations. He oversaw the introduction of the second version of the iPad and introduced a music-storage service called iCloud. He traveled to China to discuss the iPhone with China Mobile Ltd. (941), the country’s largest mobile-phone carrier.

Jobs announced his resignation Aug. 24. “I have always said if there ever came a day when I could no longer meet my duties and expectations as Apple’s CEO, I would be the first to let you know,” Jobs said in a statement. “Unfortunately, that day has come.”

In the weeks preceding his resignation, Jobs was largely housebound, according to a person familiar with the matter.

“Under Steve’s leadership Apple has not only revolutionized the computer industry but also transformed how the world communicates, plays, shops and works,” Frank Quattrone, CEO of Qatalyst Partners LLP, a Silicon Valley investment bank, said at the time. “In the entrepreneur hall of fame, he is the charter member. He is, and will remain, an inspiration to the world.”

Post-Jobs Era

Cook became CEO for good. While Cook had mastered an expanding list of operational roles, including manufacturing, distribution, sales and customer service, he hadn’t demonstrated Jobs’s penchant for product vision.

In the post-Jobs era, that role would lie more squarely with head product designer Ive, who oversaw the development of devices including the iMac, iPod, iPhone and iPad. Rounding out the executive team are Scott Forstall, who is in charge of the iOS software that powers the iPhone and iPad; Philip Schiller, who leads product marketing; Bob Mansfield, who heads Mac hardware engineering; and Chief Financial Officer Peter Oppenheimer, who is tasked with overseeing Apple’s more than $75 billion in cash and long-term holdings.

Jobs left a company with a market value larger than that of Microsoft and Dell combined. Apple’s revenue reached a record $65 billion in fiscal 2010, with analysts predicting that they will exceed $100 billion in 2011.

‘Magical’ Thinking

Besides relying on surging demand for the iPhone and iPad, Apple is also counting on growth in China. “We’re just scratching the surface right now,” Cook said of the region in July. The company is also due to sell a new service called iCloud that will let users access photos, videos and other content across an array of Apple products.

The Apple Jobs left behind was well suited to confront the challenges it then faced, including the Google threat, largely because of a product lineup Jobs set in motion, analysts and investors said at the time of his resignation. The concern is whether the company can produce industry-disrupting devices long after Jobs’s influence recedes.

“The world rarely sees someone who has had the profound impact Steve has had, the effects of which will be felt for many generations to come,” Bill Gates said after his passing. “Steve and I first met nearly 30 years ago, and have been colleagues, competitors and friends over the course of more than half our lives.”

At the AllThingsD conference in 2007, Gates had said, “I’d give a lot to have Steve’s taste. The way he does things is just different and, you know, I think it’s magical.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Jim Aley in New York at jaley@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Microsoft Said Nowhere Close to Yahoo Bid

By Dina Bass, Ronald Grover and Jeffrey McCracken - Oct 6, 2011 5:25 AM GMT+0700
Enlarge image Microsoft Is Said to Be Nowhere Close to Making Bid

Microsoft Corp. signage sits on display before a keynote speech by Steve Ballmer, chief executive officer of Microsoft, during the 2011 International Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

Oct. 5 (Bloomberg) -- Bob Rice, general managing partner at Tangent Capital Partners LLC, talks about Microsoft Corp.'s business strategy. Microsoft isn’t anywhere close to making an offer for Yahoo! Inc. and senior executives of the software maker aren’t involved in discussions, two people familiar with the matter said. Rice also talks about Apple Inc.'s iPhone 4S and the management change at Hewlett-Packard Co. He speaks with Emily Chang on Bloomberg Television's "Bloomberg West." (Source: Bloomberg)


Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) isn’t anywhere close to making an offer for Yahoo! Inc. and senior executives of the software maker aren’t involved in discussions, two people familiar with the matter said.

Microsoft does plan to review Yahoo’s financial information, due to be circulated as soon as this week, said one of the people, who asked not to be identified because the deliberations are private. Yahoo doesn’t regard Microsoft as a serious bidder, said a person familiar with Yahoo’s thinking.

Yahoo shares surged 10 percent today after Reuters reported that Microsoft may make an offer. Yahoo is fielding inquiries from potential buyers after ousting Chief Executive Office Carol Bartz and starting a review of its strategic options last month. Yahoo rose $1.46 to $15.92 at 4 p.m. New York time in Nasdaq Stock Market trading, the biggest gain since October 2008.

Yahoo turned down a $47.5 billion offer from Microsoft in 2008, rankling investors. The two companies later forged a 10- year agreement to outsource Yahoo’s search engine to Microsoft, diminishing the chance of a full acquisition. Since then, Yahoo has struggled to invigorate sales growth and beat back competition from Facebook Inc. and Google Inc.

Dana Lengkeek, a spokeswoman at Sunnyvale, California-based Yahoo, and Peter Wootton, a spokesman for Redmond, Washington- based Microsoft, declined to comment.

‘Multiple Parties’

Yahoo, the biggest U.S. Web portal, said in a September memo to employees that its advisers have fielded inquiries from “multiple parties” interested in unspecified options. Last week, Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. Chairman Jack Ma said he’s “very interested” in buying Yahoo, which owns about 40 percent of his company.

The private-equity firm Silver Lake also has discussed a possible bid for Yahoo, part of a deal that may include Alibaba and Russia’s Digital Sky Technologies, people with direct knowledge of the matter have told Bloomberg.

The Silver Lake group contacted Yahoo and its advisers in recent weeks to inform them of a possible offer, said one person, who declined to be identified because the talks are private. The discussions are still at an early stage and it’s not certain that the group will agree to make a bid, the people said.

Before Yahoo’s stock surge today, the shares had declined 13 percent this year.

Editors: Tom Giles, Jillian Ward

To contact the reporters on this story: Dina Bass in Seattle at dbass2@bloomberg.net; Ronald Grover in Los Angeles at rgrover5@bloomberg.net; Jeffrey McCracken in New York at jmccracken3@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tom Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net




Read more...

Microsoft Will Offer TV Service on Xbox Through Verizon, Comcast Agreement

By Dina Bass and Cliff Edwards - Oct 6, 2011 5:50 AM GMT+0700

Microsoft Corp. will offer television service to Xbox Live users through a partnership with Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Comcast Corp. (CMCSA), a bid to use TV programming to attract more customers to its game console.

The Xbox service will offer content from almost 40 television and entertainment companies, Redmond, Washington- based Microsoft said today in a statement. In addition to Verizon and Comcast, the partners include AT&T Inc., Time Warner Inc.’s HBO, Sony Corp.’s Crackle and the BBC.

Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer wants to lure more families and casual gamers to the Xbox by making it an entertainment center, challenging TV services from Apple Inc. (AAPL) and Google Inc. (GOOG) Today’s announcement furthers a move started in 2008, when Microsoft added Netflix Inc.’s video streaming and the music service Last.fm.

“The vision of the Xbox back in 2001 was that it would be an entertainment hub,” said Michael Pachter, an analyst at Wedbush Securities in Los Angeles. “Until they launched Netflix on Xbox Live, it really wasn’t that. Today we go from Netflix and Last.fm to 40 vendors.”

Microsoft rose 55 cents, or 2.2 percent, to $25.89 today on the Nasdaq Stock Market. The shares have declined 7.2 percent this year.

Network Stations

The Xbox, first released a decade ago, accounted for 48 percent of all current-generation consoles in the U.S. between 2005 and June of this year, according to Microsoft data. Xbox Live, an Internet service with free and paid versions, already has more than 35 million members.

Microsoft didn’t announce any deals with U.S. network TV stations, though Comcast and other partners are “quite likely” to add that kind of content in the future, said Ross Honey, general manager of content acquisition for Microsoft’s Interactive Entertainment business. Some network TV content can already be viewed on Xbox using the Hulu LLC service.

Other partners announced today include Lovefilm in the U.K., a subsidiary of Amazon.com Inc.; Spain’s Telefonica SA (TEF); and Mexico’s Grupo Televisa SA.

Microsoft also plans an application for its Windows Phone mobile software that will turn phones into an enhanced remote control for the Xbox service. Users will be able to search for programs and then set them to play on the Xbox, as well as view additional information about the program, Honey said.

Apple, Google

The company intends to offer apps that work with the Xbox TV service for Apple’s iOS software as well, Pachter said, citing a Microsoft analyst briefing yesterday. Honey declined to comment on those plans, except to say that Microsoft has been expanding some products to both iOS and Google’s Android.

Some programming will require customers to be subscribers to Microsoft’s Xbox Live pay service. Other content, such as the BBC and other public television, will work with the free version of Xbox Live, Honey said.

Customers won’t have to know which channel or provider offers the show or movie they want. Instead they can say or type the name of the program and Xbox’s Bing search service will return all options for viewing it, including ones the customer doesn’t currently subscribe to, Honey said.

TV service efforts by companies such as Apple and Google have gotten little traction with customers. Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook has said that his company’s Apple TV product remains “a hobby business.” In April, Logitech International SA cut the price of its Google TV device, citing slow initial sales.

Microsoft has some advantages over those companies, Pachter said. It already has a big presence in customers’ living rooms: A total of 55 million Xbox 360 machines have been sold worldwide. The company also can draw on its search engine, its Kinect motion-and-voice sensor technology and the new content agreements.

“Each of those guys has a strength, but nobody has hardware already in the living room, with voice command that works,’” he said. “Microsoft has a big advantage.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Dina Bass in Seattle at dbass2@bloomberg.net; Cliff Edwards in San Francisco at cedwards28@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Thomas Giles at tgiles5@bloomberg.net





Read more...

Anonymous Vows NYSE Attack to Support Wall Street Protests

By Michael Riley and Nina Mehta - Oct 6, 2011 12:59 AM GMT+0700

Anonymous, a group of self-styled hacker-activists behind attacks on corporate and government websites, vowed to support the Occupy Wall Street protests by erasing the New York Stock Exchange “from the Internet” on Oct. 10.

The group posted a video message on YouTube declaring war on the world’s largest stock exchange in retaliation for the mass arrests of Wall Street protesters, and posted a link to the video on one of several Anonymous Twitter feeds.

The two-minute message didn’t elaborate on the threat or whether it referred only to an attack on the NYSE website, which would have no effect on trading.

Anonymous has launched several so-called directed denial of service attacks on websites over several months, including actions in December against the sites of MasterCard Inc. (MA) and Visa Inc. (V) Members of the group use specialized software to launch the attacks, which can slow or crash the site for a short period of time, according to court documents.

Richard Adamonis, a spokesman for NYSE Euronext (NYX), which operates the exchange, said the company doesn’t comment on rumors or security matters.

NYSE.com includes corporate information, press releases, trading notices, the company’s rules and bylaws, and access to services for companies whose stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The trading systems are run separately through a secure data center in Mahwah, New Jersey.

Homeland Security Memo

Last month, the Department of Homeland Security circulated a memo warning of cyber attacks by Anonymous, as well as the group’s involvement in the Occupy Wall Street protests.

Anonymous had deployed new tools to help members attack websites, the memo said, listing two pieces of software called #RefRef and Apache Killer.

The memo also said that the group was trying to recruit employees of Wall Street companies and warned of possible blackmail attempts against other insiders to gain their cooperation.

“Anonymous has recently used Twitter to attempt to solicit ideologically dissatisfied, sympathetic employees from within institutions in the financial sector,” DHS said in the memo said. “To date these attempts appear unsuccessful,” the department said.

Disputed Threat

The threat been disputed by some members of Anonymous, who said on Twitter that it hadn’t been sanctioned. A similar dispute occurred over an announcement in July that Anonymous would attack Facebook on Nov. 5, 2011.

A posting on Anonnews.org said it was almost impossible to verify the operation because of the nature of Anonymous as an organization “free of hierarchical structure.”

The potential attack on NYSE “may or may not be a false flag operation initiated by authorities in order to discredit Anonymous and Occupy Wall Street,” the post said.

Stocks listed on the New York Stock Exchange trade on almost all U.S. exchanges and other systems where investors can buy and sell securities, including electronic communications networks, broker-dealers and dark pools, or private venues that match orders without displaying prices in advance.

To contact the reporters on this story: Michael Riley in Washington at michaelriley@bloomberg.net; Nina Mehta in New York at nmehta24@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net; Nick Baker at nbaker7@bloomberg.net.





Read more...